We openly and shamelessly admit we're heavily biased towards RvR.bloodi wrote:Of course but in the same vein, a lot of times i have to go to Orvr instead of doing scs because otherwise i would never get past merc.wargrimnir wrote:Yet people still do them. I believe pretty strongly you could do away with all the special set gear/weapons, and people would still run scenarios just for the RP and drops and chance to kill someone right-this-second. Incentives don't make something interesting or FUN to play. They make it a requirement if the incentives are good enough, then people complain they have to do something they don't like for too long and just want it faster.
The thing is you are incentivating me to do Orvr, which is cool but you are also discouraging me of doing scs in the same way. You dont even entertain the possiblity of a 5 to 1 exchange that makes it way slower to obtain orvr gear in scs, you dont give options at all, you point at orvr and tell us, do that or suck it.
And mind you orvr has bags which already are an incentive since they give you the option of bypassing chunks of the grind.
Scen requires 24 people total to be worthwhile. An RvR lake doesn't get good until you got closer to 100v100. Whatever keeps bodies fighting in the lake, we're gonna lean towards that first.