Hi!
I have a slayer RR81, and i want try a healer. I'm thinking a WP or a RP. What is better and why?
Thank you
WP or RP?
Ads
Re: WP or RP?
RP is usually better than WP (maybe except for city and fort where WP has a slight edge). And WP is even more boring (in salv spec, which is best heal spec) than RP.
RP better cause: better resource management, better utility (WP has almost none), insane buffs to heal rune.
This is a good build for RP:
https://builder.returnofreckoning.com/c ... ,3847,3846
You can swap regenerative shielding for stoutness of Stone.
RP better cause: better resource management, better utility (WP has almost none), insane buffs to heal rune.
This is a good build for RP:
https://builder.returnofreckoning.com/c ... ,3847,3846
You can swap regenerative shielding for stoutness of Stone.
Arbich-BW/Xanthippe-WP/Schnipsel-AM
Re: WP or RP?
Depending what gameplay you prefer.
For Cities and warband scale blob battles I see WP miles ahead of RP. Faster group heal and higher armor value help a lot when two blobs clash into each other.
But ... who can actually resist to play a sexy dwarf. RP is also fine and a lot of fun to play. Even after many years a well timed stagger still gives me a smile on my face.
For Cities and warband scale blob battles I see WP miles ahead of RP. Faster group heal and higher armor value help a lot when two blobs clash into each other.
But ... who can actually resist to play a sexy dwarf. RP is also fine and a lot of fun to play. Even after many years a well timed stagger still gives me a smile on my face.
Halvar RP
Halver SL
Halversen IB
Halva ENG
Halver SL
Halversen IB
Halva ENG
Re: WP or RP?
Just ask yourself this- do you want to play a midget for a months to come?
"Can we play with him, master? He seems so unhappy. Let us help him smile. Please? Or at least let us carve one on his face when he stops screaming."
— Azeila, Alluress of Slaanesh
— Azeila, Alluress of Slaanesh
Re: WP or RP?
if you are wearing vanquisher **Arbich wrote: Tue Jun 09, 2020 3:48 pm RP is usually better than WP (maybe except for city and fort where WP has a slight edge). And WP is even more boring (in salv spec, which is best heal spec) than RP.
RP better cause: better resource management, better utility (WP has almost none), insane buffs to heal rune.
This is a good build for RP:
https://builder.returnofreckoning.com/c ... ,3847,3846
You can swap regenerative shielding for stoutness of Stone.
Re: WP or RP?
WP group heal spam and Group cleanse make it better than any other . There are many viable ways to play it as well. Ruinie is a very good second heal for buffs and best single target burst heal and hots. Like above said runie has no resource management as wp mechanic takes some getting used to.
Order: 80 AM / 77 RP/ 75 Knight
Destro: 82 Sham / 80 Zealot/ 80 DoK
Destro: 82 Sham / 80 Zealot/ 80 DoK
-
nuadarstark
- Posts: 226
Re: WP or RP?
Honestly? I think all 3 Order healers have their place and utility, plus are all fun as hell. RPs have great heals and tons of utility, WPs are team healing machines with ridiculous survivability (great armour, massive HP potential and AoE detaunt on CD? Yes please.) and solid utility & with the current morale bomb nerf, insta combat resing AMs are the **** in prolonged, sustained fights.
Raid boss Salv WP Guernios - rr83, full Sov
DPS SnB SM Valianoris - rr81, full Sov
DPS SnB SM Valianoris - rr81, full Sov
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests



