SM vs WL for group play?
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
Optional: Start your topic title with your class in brackets (e.g., [Shaman]). It helps others find your post faster.
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
Optional: Start your topic title with your class in brackets (e.g., [Shaman]). It helps others find your post faster.
-
- Posts: 27
SM vs WL for group play?
What would be more useful in group play? A 2h SM or a WL? pros/cons of each?
Ads
Re: SM vs WL for group play?
They bring a lot of utility to the table and are tankier.
Re: SM vs WL for group play?
2H SM indeed...
i thought my KotBS 78 RR was strong... till i started playing SM, at RR 42 i already fill stronger than on my KotBS...
i thought my KotBS 78 RR was strong... till i started playing SM, at RR 42 i already fill stronger than on my KotBS...
Re: SM vs WL for group play?
Atm SM own WL both dps and survivability... You can bubble, u can guard, you can dps, challenge, taunt. Yea. SM way better then broken, useless WL... I play both. Tho my WL is gettin dusty cause... Just meh.
SM 82 / IB 82 / KOTBS 82 / WL 82 / WP 72 / SW 75
CH 77 / BG 6X / BO 6X / WE 6X / MAG 6X ...and others.
CH 77 / BG 6X / BO 6X / WE 6X / MAG 6X ...and others.
Re: SM vs WL for group play?
SM by far. One of the best classes in the game.
And yes, I'm an SM homer.
And yes, I'm an SM homer.
Ads
- FinduilAsuryan
- Posts: 69
Re: SM vs WL for group play?
a sm does certainly out dps a non existent class atm...
Finduil WL 40 /81
Hakatri SM 40/80
Alqua AM 40/69
Xinduil SW 40/54
Hakatri SM 40/80
Alqua AM 40/69
Xinduil SW 40/54
Re: SM vs WL for group play?
If you already have a group to play with, ask them!
If you are hoping to find groups later, SM. Tanks are ALWAYS in demand on order.
If you are hoping to find groups later, SM. Tanks are ALWAYS in demand on order.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest