In Response To Adei:

Chat about everything else - ask questions, share stories, or just hang out.
Ninepaces
Posts: 313

In Response To Adei:

Post#1 » Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:13 pm

My turn to use a list!
-If you were trying to help you would provide actual evidence to support your claim.
-Please feel free to apply to the team with your vast experience, I'm sure you will be welcomed aboard!
-If we are encouraging bloodi doesn't that show what we think of this thread?
-I believe I have asked countless time for you to provide proof that you have not provided me or anybody else arguing your statement, and as far as professionalism goes, this would have been a much better constructive thread if you put a little more time and effort in proving your initial post!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yup, locked.
-There is no proof for pure common sense and logic. Just consider what happens in a situation where dmg multipliers are changed. Compare to wound debuff.
-I don't want to work with you.
-You have an obligation as a leader of the community to consider advice from everyone, especially in issues regarding such radical changes to the rvr system. My initial post was just a genuine comment regarding a very serious issue and should've been responded with a logical, calm response. Why do you have to be so aggressive.

Ads
User avatar
RyanMakara
Posts: 1563

Re: In Response To Adei:

Post#2 » Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:15 pm

Oy vey, this is going to go over very well methinks...
Image

User avatar
Ley
Former Staff
Posts: 1541

Re: In Response To Adei:

Post#3 » Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:18 pm

Ninepaces wrote:
My turn to use a list!
-If you were trying to help you would provide actual evidence to support your claim.
-Please feel free to apply to the team with your vast experience, I'm sure you will be welcomed aboard!
-If we are encouraging bloodi doesn't that show what we think of this thread?
-I believe I have asked countless time for you to provide proof that you have not provided me or anybody else arguing your statement, and as far as professionalism goes, this would have been a much better constructive thread if you put a little more time and effort in proving your initial post!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yup, locked.
-There is no proof for pure common sense and logic. Just consider what happens in a situation where dmg multipliers are changed. Compare to wound debuff.
-I don't want to work with you.
-You have an obligation as a leader of the community to consider advice from everyone, especially in issues regarding such radical changes to the rvr system. My initial post was just a genuine comment regarding a very serious issue and should've been responded with a logical, calm response. Why do you have to be so aggressive.

Please provide proof to your former thread and this will stay open. Proof as in numbers, math.

bloodi
Suspended
Posts: 1725

Re: In Response To Adei:

Post#4 » Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:22 pm

Ninepaces wrote:-There is no proof for pure common sense and logic..
This is the kind of content i was expecting from a man of such brilliance.

When are you releasing your next standup routine?

User avatar
adei
Posts: 272

Re: In Response To Adei:

Post#5 » Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:23 pm

Ninepaces wrote: -There is no proof for pure common sense and logic. Just consider what happens in a situation where dmg multipliers are changed. Compare to wound debuff.
-I don't want to work with you.
-You have an obligation as a leader of the community to consider advice from everyone, especially in issues regarding such radical changes to the rvr system. My initial post was just a genuine comment regarding a very serious issue and should've been responded with a logical, calm response. Why do you have to be so aggressive.
I have an obligation as a player as well to point out when I think people are wrong and call them out on the bullshit they post when they provide 0 evidence to add to the claim that they make, You initial post gave none of this, no numbers, no nothing. How do you expect us to take that feedback into consideration when right after a new system is brought into place you cannot even be bother to go out and test it in order to provide some actual evidence?

Not quite sure where aggressive is coming from, I asked many times in the previous thread for actual evidence to be present, if you can provide me with this that proves your point I will of course concede and give you a full apology, but until then I stand firm on my point.

User avatar
Vigfuss
Posts: 383

Re: In Response To Adei:

Post#6 » Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:28 pm

I don't think you need numbers to make a point like that, especially if you take the wounds debuff out of the discussion, the damage formula should not be messed with. I think burden of proof is on the devs in this case.

I understand his frustration completely.
Fusscle of Critical Acclaim

User avatar
Azarael
Posts: 5332

Re: In Response To Adei:

Post#7 » Fri Sep 23, 2016 7:31 pm

The original poster and I have discussed the issue in game, and he has requested that this topic be locked.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Nauht and 18 guests