Gobtar wrote:
Okay you have some major problems with your arguement; Bandwagoning, and Changing the goalposts are a couple. Never did I say that the BG is solely a CC bot, but in this current meta, with Mara a plenty, the redundancy means certain tools get out shined.
Oh yeah you never did say that, oh wait:
Gobtar wrote:. As soon as you throw a mara into the mix, you are basically a glorified CC/guard bot.
But yeah, its me changing the goalposts, its me the one who throws exagerations that have no basis on reality then pretends he never did.
Gobtar wrote:You can make a RPs life hell...but as said time and time again, if you want to catch said RP you need to be on top of him before the battle line gets to him
Or you could superpunt their healing targets so he has to come to you but lets forget about that since it makes your argument pointless right?
Gobtar wrote:Iron Breakers make Zealots cry, except they also do much more than have this one quality.
Iron breakers are cleansable by zealots, they just affect doks, they are also unable to ap drain them, just healdebuff them. So they dont even have that quality.
Gobtar wrote:The CC i do have, I like, but I know its weaknesses, in a combat where a second or two means life and death, you can't afford to wait for your block to come up. When playing defensive, I would rather have consistent CC than not. The BGs CC is most reliable when guarding MDPS and thus in a melee train.
For someone who claims to be all about 6vs6 and 12vs12 and thinks all about that, you seem to lack the basic knowledge about how a 6 man group works, TTK is often talked about not because people dies 3 seconds after the fight starts, its because people dies in 3 seconds when the window to do so pops up, when talking about the BG, such window is usually when the BG tells his group he know can KD.
Hell, you seem to be mixing fights within competitive groups and a premade fighting pugs for how you talk, no fight is decided on the first 5 seconds or 20 when two good groups collide.
Gobtar wrote:You said that building a group around a BG would make it the greatest thing ever, how far do you have to compromise your groups viability to make the BG shine?
Not very far and surely not far enough to not be compensated by what he brings even if you like to claim otherwise.
Gobtar wrote:I think BGs are playable tanks, they have all the core abilities that all other tanks have, they have CC skills that require effort but can be made to work, worse still you have been straw-maning my original argument this whole time forcing me to defend my stance on the one quality I think is useful to the BG...in this weird messed up counterpoint. The BG strengths are it's ability to CC HARDER (not better) than other classes, it has internal trade-offs...these traits don't mean the other aspects of the class are fine.
No, it just means you have been ignoring the good parts to only point out the bad parts in order to portray a skewed view on the viability of the BG, i mean, when you only point situations where they are bad and refuse to talk about how good they are on others, is not me straw manning you, is you being partisan.
Gobtar wrote:We are looking at the BGs ability to be competitive with other tank choices, which for destro yields it at the bottom of the barrel. And if it so happens that your opinion of me might lead this thread to be spared by your vitriol, please ignore away, I tire of defending my stance from fallacious arguments laced with snide remarks.
I am pretty sure i never mentioned a single thing about you, i dont think i ever saw you play, mostly because i dont tend to pay attention to anyone names, what i did however was tell you to stop being partisan and telling half truths, which seems to be all the base for your argumentation on the bg, in this very same quote you go and say they are the bottom of the barrel, which is, to be honest, a laughable statement. Is even more funny that you go on and say you are "tired of defeding my stance from fallacious arguments with snide remarks.
Because after all, thats is a well documented fallacy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisoning_the_well
TenTonHammer wrote:
This is not about bg being bad its about 2h bg being sub par and about the class being kinda redundant and kinda underwhelming now in comparison to BO whose stats teal now makes the class feel kinda mandatory in the way that chosen with resists aura kinda feels mandatory
l
No, its not about 2h anymore, you know that, you already pages ago stepped in the realm of "BG is the worst tank in the game" and continue to claim it post after post.
And i say this because i would fully agree with the BG 2h being subpar to the IB, hell, everyone 2h is subpar to the IB version but you are talking about the super punt, detaunt immunity and so on being bad, you already went from an agreeable position to a straight up partisan and biased one.