Recent Topics

Ads

New cap dmg

Chat about everything else - ask questions, share stories, or just hang out.

Poll: Is the lvl 35 dmg/burst too high?

Yes.
60
48%
No.
64
52%
Total votes: 124

bloodi
Suspended
Posts: 1725

Re: New cap dmg

Post#61 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 4:35 pm

Sulorie wrote:This rotation is correct. No idea what bloodi is talking. Btw, never use doombolt in a dot rotation, we don't have 3sec cast time and it's not spirit damage. AB performs much better.
Bloodi is talking that at current rank fireball performss better than SB+PS,unless is to mask BB,

Thats why i also mention it will only crit for 1k in your dreams, currently i only sasw 1k crits on low level mobs with corp debuff on.

Specially with the bugs at the moment, i would argue that SB is not worth it for the bust yet, it will be though.

Ads
User avatar
roadkillrobin
Posts: 2773

Re: New cap dmg

Post#62 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 9:02 pm

Armor vallues are completly fine arn't they? :P

Image
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
Tesq
Posts: 5713

Re: New cap dmg

Post#63 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 9:35 pm

burn lies away crited my tank for 420 each tick ...
Image

User avatar
TenTonHammer
Posts: 3806

Re: New cap dmg

Post#64 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 9:49 pm

Isnt bal criting for that much standard procedure?

you mitigated 1.5k dmg with 800 tough ?

Tesq wrote:burn lies away crited my tank for 420 each tick ...
Spoiler:
Image



im sorry
Image

User avatar
roadkillrobin
Posts: 2773

Re: New cap dmg

Post#65 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 10:33 pm

All numbers are there.
The only thing i don't have is the WH's str and WS.
The dmg mitigrated on the combat log acounts for toughness aswell. Wich is almoast as high as it can be. And i'm still only mitigrating around 60%ish damage.

@Tesq BAL has a big end tick you can see the normal tick hitting me for around 300. That would have been aprox a 500 crit, This is still way to much dmg on a tank considering it hits against armor tho. Under normal circumstances that 1088 hit Would probobly hit for around 700.
Image

User avatar
Lileldys
Posts: 666

Re: New cap dmg

Post#66 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 10:44 pm

roadkillrobin wrote:Armor vallues are completly fine arn't they? :P

Image
Image
Image
http://waronlinebuilder.org/#career=wh; ... ;;;0:0:0:0:

User avatar
magter3001
Posts: 1284

Re: New cap dmg

Post#67 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 11:01 pm

Lileldys wrote:
Spoiler:
roadkillrobin wrote:Armor vallues are completly fine arn't they? :P

Image
Image
Image
http://waronlinebuilder.org/#career=wh; ... ;;;0:0:0:0:
I doubt the guy used Seal of Destruction because he would either have to give up a knockdown or a 50% crit increaser.

waronlinebuilder.org - Witch Hunter build

It's possible... however unlikely. ;)
Agrot 35/40 Aggychopp 32/40
Grelin of Magnus/Badlands ;)

User avatar
roadkillrobin
Posts: 2773

Re: New cap dmg

Post#68 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 11:06 pm

He was also rank 34 :)
Image

Ads
User avatar
Tesq
Posts: 5713

Re: New cap dmg

Post#69 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 11:09 pm

roadkillrobin wrote:All numbers are there.
The only thing i don't have is the WH's str and WS.
The dmg mitigrated on the combat log acounts for toughness aswell. Wich is almoast as high as it can be. And i'm still only mitigrating around 60%ish damage.

@Tesq BAL has a big end tick you can see the normal tick hitting me for around 300. That would have been aprox a 500 crit, This is still way to much dmg on a tank considering it hits against armor tho. Under normal circumstances that 1088 hit Would probobly hit for around 700.
exatly what is odd is that it's not torment which i could expect somethign like this but it should get mitigated by armor and i also probably was spec oppression that time so was hanging around with 4k armor and 15% damage reduction.
Image

User avatar
Valnak
Posts: 104

Re: New cap dmg

Post#70 » Wed Feb 24, 2016 11:21 pm

roadkillrobin wrote:He was also rank 34 :)
Bolster is stupid OP right now.
Tury06 wrote:I agree about premade doesnt require skill at all
Image
Image
This is 2016. Why do the devs allow the magus to continue to be overpowered?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 2 guests