Apparently the OP is losing the lyric battle too.mickeye wrote:The first post looks strange
so the guy should change
how on the forum he post.
Less time to read it would cost
for all forum members
during the month December.
I think there is a need to reward keep defance.
Re: I think there is a need to reward keep defance.
Dying is no option.
Ads
Re: I think there is a need to reward keep defance.
Idadlyj wrote:t3 open many time ago.
but t3 is folgenschwer
keep attker;s can a get reward medalion.
but defander;s not.
it;s make a bat guy's (girl)
oders win ->login order
destro win-> login destro
it make population imbalance
and. no defance only gank playing.
my a constructive
outkeep door break defance -> 1medal reward
inkeep door break defance-> 2meadl reward
you think?
DID
NOT
READ
THIS
POST
BECAUSE
OF
THE
DOUBLE
SPACING
Soulcheg wrote:Want mirrored classes - play chess.
#266Genisaurus wrote:You are not entitled to Best-in-Slot gear just because you log on.
- RyanMakara
- Posts: 1563
Re: I think there is a need to reward keep defance.
I think the suggestion has been made before by Tesq;
Keep defense tick occurs when your keep door goes up again. In T3 (the main focus of medals), there should be 1 medal awarded for defending the keep, if only the outer goes back up again, and 2 medals awarded for defending the keep, with both the inner and outer door going back up again.
Also an increase in renown/experience/influence scaled to how big the fight was (as keep capture ticks do) would be nice to see.
Keep defense tick occurs when your keep door goes up again. In T3 (the main focus of medals), there should be 1 medal awarded for defending the keep, if only the outer goes back up again, and 2 medals awarded for defending the keep, with both the inner and outer door going back up again.
Also an increase in renown/experience/influence scaled to how big the fight was (as keep capture ticks do) would be nice to see.

Re: I think there is a need to reward keep defance.
Problem is people will just turtle in their keeps waiting for the other realm to attack (we already saw this in t2 when level cap was lower; some WBs would turtle in their keeps even when the other side had AAO).RyanMakara wrote:I think the suggestion has been made before by Tesq;
Keep defense tick occurs when your keep door goes up again. In T3 (the main focus of medals), there should be 1 medal awarded for defending the keep, if only the outer goes back up again, and 2 medals awarded for defending the keep, with both the inner and outer door going back up again.
Also an increase in renown/experience/influence scaled to how big the fight was (as keep capture ticks do) would be nice to see.
The reward for succesfully defending a keep is a **** ton of influence/renown/xp (succesful defense usually means you wiped your attackers, possibly while having AAO, possibly several times until they gave up). Once they finally give up, you should go out of your keep and start taking BOs so you can attack/take the enemy keep for your medals.
- katroulitsa
- Posts: 342
Re: I think there is a need to reward keep defance.
I want one with blank versemickeye wrote:The first post looks strange
so the guy should change
how on the forum he post.
Less time to read it would cost
for all forum members
during the month December.

Inav
Semya
Semya
Re: I think there is a need to reward keep defance.
Ye but if ppl def and kills occur well both sides get meddalions so dfender have still a way to earn meddalions even with out attacks keep. The problem lies withing the fix ammount someone should recive for doing something, as drop from kill are random and same is valid for roll so there should be some way to have done not randomly. Also you need that door to close so you wont get those meddaliosn so easily. A kill quest was also suggested but unless you do some chain quests a single only repetable kill quest that reward meddalions would make ppl move again inside scPenril wrote:Problem is people will just turtle in their keeps waiting for the other realm to attack (we already saw this in t2 when level cap was lower; some WBs would turtle in their keeps even when the other side had AAO).RyanMakara wrote:I think the suggestion has been made before by Tesq;
Keep defense tick occurs when your keep door goes up again. In T3 (the main focus of medals), there should be 1 medal awarded for defending the keep, if only the outer goes back up again, and 2 medals awarded for defending the keep, with both the inner and outer door going back up again.
Also an increase in renown/experience/influence scaled to how big the fight was (as keep capture ticks do) would be nice to see.
The reward for succesfully defending a keep is a **** ton of influence/renown/xp (succesful defense usually means you wiped your attackers, possibly while having AAO, possibly several times until they gave up). Once they finally give up, you should go out of your keep and start taking BOs so you can attack/take the enemy keep for your medals.

I see no other incentive for ppl to def, cos it's not t4 you dont loose nothing if a zone get lock.
This make ppl def only when you have 100% chance to def aka farm attackers.
I'm not against 6 ppl def a keep vs 24 if they are good they deserve 2 meddalions.
the alternative was keep capture quest---> that unlock a meddalion kill quest.
then back again, this way you need to capture keep to earn the meddalion, but this wont solve def vs zerg problem . Maybe both solutions should be implemented and devastator cost should be updade.
Anyway with gunband be look at the pve sets will forcefully enter in the meta at some point.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests