Recent Topics

Ads

I think there is a need to reward keep defance.

Chat about everything else - ask questions, share stories, or just hang out.
Sulorie
Posts: 7461

Re: I think there is a need to reward keep defance.

Post#21 » Mon Dec 07, 2015 1:21 pm

mickeye wrote:The first post looks strange

so the guy should change

how on the forum he post.

Less time to read it would cost

for all forum members

during the month December.
Apparently the OP is losing the lyric battle too.
Dying is no option.

Ads
User avatar
zabis
Posts: 1215

Re: I think there is a need to reward keep defance.

Post#22 » Mon Dec 07, 2015 3:30 pm

dadlyj wrote:t3 open many time ago.

but t3 is folgenschwer

keep attker;s can a get reward medalion.

but defander;s not.

it;s make a bat guy's (girl)

oders win ->login order

destro win-> login destro

it make population imbalance

and. no defance only gank playing.

my a constructive

outkeep door break defance -> 1medal reward

inkeep door break defance-> 2meadl reward

you think?
I

DID

NOT

READ

THIS

POST

BECAUSE

OF

THE

DOUBLE

SPACING
Soulcheg wrote:Want mirrored classes - play chess.
Genisaurus wrote:You are not entitled to Best-in-Slot gear just because you log on.
#266

User avatar
RyanMakara
Posts: 1563

Re: I think there is a need to reward keep defance.

Post#23 » Mon Dec 07, 2015 4:00 pm

I think the suggestion has been made before by Tesq;
Keep defense tick occurs when your keep door goes up again. In T3 (the main focus of medals), there should be 1 medal awarded for defending the keep, if only the outer goes back up again, and 2 medals awarded for defending the keep, with both the inner and outer door going back up again.

Also an increase in renown/experience/influence scaled to how big the fight was (as keep capture ticks do) would be nice to see.
Image

Penril
Posts: 4441

Re: I think there is a need to reward keep defance.

Post#24 » Mon Dec 07, 2015 4:07 pm

RyanMakara wrote:I think the suggestion has been made before by Tesq;
Keep defense tick occurs when your keep door goes up again. In T3 (the main focus of medals), there should be 1 medal awarded for defending the keep, if only the outer goes back up again, and 2 medals awarded for defending the keep, with both the inner and outer door going back up again.

Also an increase in renown/experience/influence scaled to how big the fight was (as keep capture ticks do) would be nice to see.
Problem is people will just turtle in their keeps waiting for the other realm to attack (we already saw this in t2 when level cap was lower; some WBs would turtle in their keeps even when the other side had AAO).

The reward for succesfully defending a keep is a **** ton of influence/renown/xp (succesful defense usually means you wiped your attackers, possibly while having AAO, possibly several times until they gave up). Once they finally give up, you should go out of your keep and start taking BOs so you can attack/take the enemy keep for your medals.

User avatar
katroulitsa
Posts: 342

Re: I think there is a need to reward keep defance.

Post#25 » Mon Dec 07, 2015 4:15 pm

mickeye wrote:The first post looks strange

so the guy should change

how on the forum he post.

Less time to read it would cost

for all forum members

during the month December.
I want one with blank verse :(
Inav
Semya

User avatar
Tesq
Posts: 5713

Re: I think there is a need to reward keep defance.

Post#26 » Mon Dec 07, 2015 5:27 pm

Penril wrote:
RyanMakara wrote:I think the suggestion has been made before by Tesq;
Keep defense tick occurs when your keep door goes up again. In T3 (the main focus of medals), there should be 1 medal awarded for defending the keep, if only the outer goes back up again, and 2 medals awarded for defending the keep, with both the inner and outer door going back up again.

Also an increase in renown/experience/influence scaled to how big the fight was (as keep capture ticks do) would be nice to see.
Problem is people will just turtle in their keeps waiting for the other realm to attack (we already saw this in t2 when level cap was lower; some WBs would turtle in their keeps even when the other side had AAO).

The reward for succesfully defending a keep is a **** ton of influence/renown/xp (succesful defense usually means you wiped your attackers, possibly while having AAO, possibly several times until they gave up). Once they finally give up, you should go out of your keep and start taking BOs so you can attack/take the enemy keep for your medals.
Ye but if ppl def and kills occur well both sides get meddalions so dfender have still a way to earn meddalions even with out attacks keep. The problem lies withing the fix ammount someone should recive for doing something, as drop from kill are random and same is valid for roll so there should be some way to have done not randomly. Also you need that door to close so you wont get those meddaliosn so easily. A kill quest was also suggested but unless you do some chain quests a single only repetable kill quest that reward meddalions would make ppl move again inside sc :(
I see no other incentive for ppl to def, cos it's not t4 you dont loose nothing if a zone get lock.
This make ppl def only when you have 100% chance to def aka farm attackers.
I'm not against 6 ppl def a keep vs 24 if they are good they deserve 2 meddalions.

the alternative was keep capture quest---> that unlock a meddalion kill quest.

then back again, this way you need to capture keep to earn the meddalion, but this wont solve def vs zerg problem . Maybe both solutions should be implemented and devastator cost should be updade.
Anyway with gunband be look at the pve sets will forcefully enter in the meta at some point.
Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 6 guests