Return of Reckoning

Shibirian wrote:

nexis72 wrote:The best system of the poll is the RoR system. The worse is the resource carrier system.

^^^
This.


Never missed Fortresses on live, though; I was very happy with Zone Locks with last Keep take and then right off to City Siege action!

I wont lie, the Fortresses we amazing... But the problem was the amount of time it took to go from start to finish of the City Siege. the Fortresses were just too easy to Defend lol, and anyone without decent machine could'nt even participate.

Which I think would be even Harder to deal with here. The graphical Hitching in this game is second to none.

The problem that it will come down to for the other options that are not 1 and 2 are the lack of people in lower tiers. If there is no one playing lower zones then it will be hard to have realm/zone control. Especially for the NA players.

Only need to make minor changes to them. Like making SC and PVE a way to make extra points instead of it adding or reducing weight on the ballance scale for 3 and it works with small numbers.

Bacta wrote:The problem that it will come down to for the other options that are not 1 and 2 are the lack of people in lower tiers. If there is no one playing lower zones then it will be hard to have realm/zone control. Especially for the NA players.

not completely true. Now that we can DeBolster and use previous zones, Im confident the main guilds will have additional Toons "twinked" for the other tiers.

Who voted for the third option? If so do the Destro no one will capture. All zones will be constantly under order, because Destro dont wins scenario never. It will be very boring and dull without opposition

Victory points without PVE/SC

That make battles epic where coordination and server community effort relay matter

All what was after that is just easy mode, game for kids. Last path was disaster and one of nails to WAR coffin.

Khrum wrote:Victory points without PVE/SC

That make battles epic where coordination and server community effort relay matter

All what was after that is just easy mode, game for kids. Last path was disaster and one of nails to WAR coffin.

I absolutely agree!!

I enjoyed 1.4.x the most once they fixed all the crap the playerbase was able to come up with. It was far from perfect and it's a pity Mythic didn't have the resources to work it further out. So I voted for (5), the RC patch but ...

No for SC/PVE being part of the campaign to push Altdorf/IC.

Anyway,
I'll like us to find a way to have all zones (T1 -> T4) for the Altdorf/IC push involved in some way, now that there's a debolster ingame. I've always missed the lower tier zones once I hit T4. May be it was only me but I had a blast during the last Live event (return to Ekrund) on my RR100 Magus, the fighting part and not the PVE part of course. I know that for healers it wasn't that fun because of the lack of group healing
But not the old VP way of doing it to lock an upper zone. May be a form of adding time to a T4 zone lock, BO lock, whatever or vice et versa. It will always depend what kind of system the devs are going to opt for what kind of advantages or disadvantages you'll get for going to lower tiers.

My 2 cents

By my memory there was always 1VP missing for a final lock - not necessarily because of SCs, but even then...

Next off was farming the enemy warcamp to make the tick happen - that took ages and sometimes didn't work out.

I still think on RoR they should probably lower the VP to lock a zone, may it only be to avoid the warcamp farming....

4 is best