Page 2 of 8

Re: Scenario changes (08.Aug.16.) POLL

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:09 pm
by Albion
I hate to be the one to grumble and I don't want to give the impression of being an ungrateful sod, but I have to say I preferred scenarios as they were before.
I understand why the devs tried to make these changes (encouraging people to work together), but I think the old battleground were still better at the end of the day. I mean most people will join SCs as pugs as they often don't have the time nor the will to build an organized party, so I think that, if we don't want to scrap the new system entirely, we should still at least have the option to join the old favourites: Battle for Praag, Mourkain Temple, Serpent Passage and Gates of Ekrund...

Just my 2 cents.
In any case thank you to the whole dev team for their dedicated, tireless efforts. Keep up the great work!

Re: Scenario changes (08.Aug.16.) POLL

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:11 pm
by StormX2
I don't seem to notice or Care agt least when im in T1 lol
But I must say I have had little to no interest in T4 as of late =(

Re: Scenario changes (08.Aug.16.) POLL

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:32 pm
by FearTheGriff
dresden stop crying please

Re: Scenario changes (08.Aug.16.) POLL

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:39 pm
by Dresden
.

Re: Scenario changes (08.Aug.16.) POLL

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:44 pm
by FearTheGriff
.

Re: Scenario changes (08.Aug.16.) POLL

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:48 pm
by RyanMakara
FearTheGriff wrote:i have and i say stop crying
He made a poll to ask player consensus on a recent update. I'd suggest you stay on-topic like everyone else instead of causing an argument out of personal grievance with the OP.

Re: Scenario changes (08.Aug.16.) POLL

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:49 pm
by RyanMakara
Albion wrote:I hate to be the one to grumble and I don't want to give the impression of being an ungrateful sod, but I have to say I preferred scenarios as they were before.
I understand why the devs tried to make these changes (encouraging people to work together), but I think the old battleground were still better at the end of the day. I mean most people will join SCs as pugs as they often don't have the time nor the will to build an organized party, so I think that, if we don't want to scrap the new system entirely, we should still at least have the option to join the old favourites: Battle for Praag, Mourkain Temple, Serpent Passage and Gates of Ekrund...

Just my 2 cents.
In any case thank you to the whole dev team for their dedicated, tireless efforts. Keep up the great work!
Once the scenarios are worked out and function better they will be put on a rotation. This batch of brand-new SCs is specifically introduced to test multiple of 'em at the same time; it's a nice change of pace from the original batch we had in my opinion.

Re: Scenario changes (08.Aug.16.) POLL

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:56 pm
by perche
in any sc is hard to get 500 point in the time, like in forge, phoenix gate or troll country, 10-13 minutes for less of 5 medallion, people still killing cause dont understand the mecanic of the new sc.

Re: Scenario changes (08.Aug.16.) POLL

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:58 pm
by Lileldys
Currently, I feel that Black Fire Basin and Doomfist Crater are in a good position. Only good ones in the pool atm(imo). Maw isn't too far from being good too.

I get making SCs with a stronger objective focus, but most of the player base can't/won't play this style imo. Aza even said you can't get people to group or whatever, and now we have some SCs where you need to group/communicate to play them well.

Update needs some work(imo mainly the map-pool sorted), and nearly all the ones I've done with my group have just turned into farming the opposition. Don't think there are many people who go into a SC and thinks "i'd love to run the objective for the whole SC or next 5-10mins..."

Pops seem to be very slow atm. Can't tell if its a population issue, or the new SCs putting people off.

Re: Scenario changes (08.Aug.16.) POLL

Posted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 5:04 pm
by Dresden
.