>The only difference is city siegesRazid1987 wrote: You do ORvR, lock zones, kill players and get loot. Only difference is the City Sieges?
And congratulations? You got Devatator in the most ineffective way possible.
Again the campaign in T4 requires thought out pushes and multi zone control. Each locked zone pushes the campaign in that pairing to a completely new zone that is otherwise locked. Forts are (were?) a thing and introduced a whole new set of gear as well a new challenge.
You had to lock 2 pairings, meaning actions done in any open zone had a lasting effect on the overall campaign. When you take a keep (defensive position) or lock a zone and pushed them back it makes a difference. However in the lower tiers taking a zone does nothing as no matter what it just unlocks 30 mins or an hour later?
Having good zerg/alliance leaders was key to successful pushes (early on when people cared and city wasn't farmed 5 times a day) thought out strats and communication where a thing.
and even if city sieges where the only difference that is a pretty massive difference in itself.
Also I wasn't bragging about getting dev by spamming scenarios, just saying it was at least for a time in NA the fastest way to get devastator, and it is still possible to be in BiS gear while removing yourself from ORvR.