there is a lot that can be done with simply map editing, such tunnel, bridge, move flags,add obstacle and walls like battle of praag scenario rework.Xergon wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 7:42 pmrmb when there was bottom floor defenses in the fort... good times...Tesq wrote: Sat May 06, 2023 5:05 pm i still think we should start by fix "flag snowballing" and map geography and then fort being ugly by not requiring realm coordinationa appart from push inside the dam lord room but oh well....
and these are very small resource intense thing to do with long time benefith, which also happen to be thing you find wrote in old forum from beta times...
about map reworks, not much u can do about geography itself, i would personally give more value to BOs (maybe some kinda star lvl progression) and make more tunnels/portals on some maps (TM/KV/BC/DW).
Can we have the old campaign back
Re: Can we have the old campaign back

Ads
Re: Can we have the old campaign back
Year 6 with orvr suggestions to devs. times listen 0 

IB WORSE TANK https://clips.twitch.tv/PreciousAcceptableHumanArgieB8
-
- Posts: 100
Re: Can we have the old campaign back
No more 1-Zone clusterfucks due to perma-locked pairings.
City not directly tied to forts anymore.
No more disruption of the Campaign from city.
City queue change.
Relevant currency available in orvr.
...
They listen. You might not like who they listen to and what they choose to implement, but they do listen.
____
If you take one good look at how city is now I think it becomes abundantly clear that a large part of the playerbase is completely uninterested in it. If it isn't mandatory, they don't do it. Forcing it as 'necessary endgame' might not be a smart decision. I personally enjoy good city fights but still think it is better the way that it is now. If you want the campaign to feel more rewarding, simply increase rewards from forts while keeping the current reservation system. That also comes with downsides but forts are at least a very natural end-point of the campaign.