Recent Topics

Ads

Which class would you like to see in the Balance Forum?

Chat about everything else - ask questions, share stories, or just hang out.

Poll: Which class would you like to see in the Balance Forum?

Warrior Priest
24
8%
Engineer
41
14%
Magus
55
19%
Squiq Herder
26
9%
Shadow Warrior
9
3%
Rune Priest
5
2%
Zealot
15
5%
Sword Master
6
2%
Black Guard
34
12%
Other
71
25%
Total votes: 286

Arteker616
Posts: 413

Re: Which class would you like to see in the Balance Forum?

Post#131 » Wed Jul 06, 2016 3:47 pm

Jaycub wrote:im not saying it's any easier/harder for one side, just that killing a RP is easier than killing a DoK.

That was one of the things I'm sure we would of eventually tried (running double WP) if it became a big enough problem. But then you are making concessions for running IB, because you are playing around the outgoing healdebuff. It's just easier to swap him out for SM, and that was pretty much unanimous which is why poor mountain had to level a knight :^)
its aswell easier to kill a zealot than a wp. so what is your point .

as usual the balance forum transformed into nerf this or this class is op. :|

Ads
bloodi
Suspended
Posts: 1725

Re: Which class would you like to see in the Balance Forum?

Post#132 » Wed Jul 06, 2016 3:48 pm

Penril wrote:Maybe because he is talking about his ORDER group struggling against destro?

Pull the stick out of your ass. Im not complaining about those tools. Im just replying to his comment since he mentioned Mara pull + M1, and Order has access to those as well (and some other tools like i mentioned).
You are missing the point, he is talking about how non optimal is to run anything that is not melee + double wp/dok and how they get destroyed once morales come up and they get cced to death.

Pointing out how order can do that too is not an argument, is just you being unable to not mention the tools of the other side because somehow you think everyone forgot about them, no one did.

Specially when to that you mention Rkds and other tools from ranged characters which will suffer the same problems as the RP.

So its not much about my stick, its fine there and does its job, its just that you are missing the point about how Ranged low armor characters get trained on.

Penril
Posts: 4441

Re: Which class would you like to see in the Balance Forum?

Post#133 » Wed Jul 06, 2016 3:49 pm

Arteker616 wrote:
Jaycub wrote:im not saying it's any easier/harder for one side, just that killing a RP is easier than killing a DoK.

That was one of the things I'm sure we would of eventually tried (running double WP) if it became a big enough problem. But then you are making concessions for running IB, because you are playing around the outgoing healdebuff. It's just easier to swap him out for SM, and that was pretty much unanimous which is why poor mountain had to level a knight :^)
its aswell easier to kill a zealot than a wp. so what is your point .

as usual the balance forum transformed into nerf this or this class is op. :|
1) This is not the balance forum
2) I dont think Jaycub is asking for an IB buff... I could be wrong though!

Roodabega
Posts: 38

Re: Which class would you like to see in the Balance Forum?

Post#134 » Wed Jul 06, 2016 3:52 pm

i would like to see more SMs in orvr, sham has plenty of options i think they are fine and in general the off trees need looked at.

User avatar
Jaycub
Posts: 3130

Re: Which class would you like to see in the Balance Forum?

Post#135 » Wed Jul 06, 2016 3:53 pm

Arteker616 wrote:
Jaycub wrote:im not saying it's any easier/harder for one side, just that killing a RP is easier than killing a DoK.

That was one of the things I'm sure we would of eventually tried (running double WP) if it became a big enough problem. But then you are making concessions for running IB, because you are playing around the outgoing healdebuff. It's just easier to swap him out for SM, and that was pretty much unanimous which is why poor mountain had to level a knight :^)
its aswell easier to kill a zealot than a wp. so what is your point .

as usual the balance forum transformed into nerf this or this class is op. :|
>double dok meta
>zealot

wew lad
<Lords of the Locker Room> <Old School>

User avatar
Zealote
Posts: 456

Re: Which class would you like to see in the Balance Forum?

Post#136 » Wed Jul 06, 2016 3:56 pm

Morf wrote:<snip> Although i am slightly jealous of AM aoe detaunt as you cant be setback meaning you can use big heals and them not end up being 5 second casts :D but i guess that makes up for the extra 5 seconds shamans get.
Just to clarify here, their aoe detaunts are both 10s aren't they? I vaguely remember (from like a yr back) it being shown in a vid from live that the no setback was for 5s but the detaunt was for 10.
Aetir

User avatar
kweedko
Posts: 519

Re: Which class would you like to see in the Balance Forum?

Post#137 » Wed Jul 06, 2016 3:56 pm

roadkillrobin wrote:
sanii wrote:
roadkillrobin wrote: Zealots really don't need love tbh, it's subjectivly he 3d strongest healer in the game and viable in both small scale and large thanks to it's varity of buffs and morale gain.
How about their dps then ? :D
Zealots have both a viable AoE dps and ST dps build. dps Zealots were used in bombgroups all the time, and their ST dps is ok.

ST
http://waronlinebuilder.org/#career=zea ... :5712:5722:
AoE
http://waronlinebuilder.org/#career=zea ... :5712:5722:
shure on high rr and in descent gear with alot of +crit, and your aoe spec uugh you go for rez debuf and ap rit instead of woi ugh :mrgreen: but in mid and low ranks their dps crap cause of low base damage from simmilar abils of other classes.
Last edited by kweedko on Wed Jul 06, 2016 3:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Penril
Posts: 4441

Re: Which class would you like to see in the Balance Forum?

Post#138 » Wed Jul 06, 2016 3:57 pm

bloodi wrote:
Penril wrote:Maybe because he is talking about his ORDER group struggling against destro?

Pull the stick out of your ass. Im not complaining about those tools. Im just replying to his comment since he mentioned Mara pull + M1, and Order has access to those as well (and some other tools like i mentioned).
You are missing the point, he is talking about how non optimal is to run anything that is not melee + double wp/dok and how they get destroyed once morales come up and they get cced to death.

Pointing out how order can do that too is not an argument, is just you being unable to not mention the tools of the other side because somehow you think everyone forgot about them, no one did.

Specially when to that you mention Rkds and other tools from ranged characters which will suffer the same problems as the RP.

So its not much about my stick, its fine there and does its job, its just that you are missing the point about how Ranged low armor characters get trained on.
I think it is you who missed the point. Pretty sure Jay and I were talking about IB and tools to get him closer to the enemy healers. Which is why i pointed out the Order tools that can help the IB in his group. The viability of rDPS/cloth healers is a different topic wich (at least Jay and I) still haven't discussed in this thread. So far, it has only been about viability of BG/IB.

Ads
sanii
Posts: 193

Re: Which class would you like to see in the Balance Forum?

Post#139 » Wed Jul 06, 2016 3:58 pm

Zealote wrote: Just to clarify here, their aoe detaunts are both 10s aren't they? I vaguely remember (from like a yr back) it being shown in a vid from live that the no setback was for 5s but the detaunt was for 10.
Don't know for both but for AM your statement is correct.
<Pxl> <Luewee> <Fhc> and many many more!
[Deep and Dry] - Order
[Dark Omen] - Destruction

User avatar
Jaycub
Posts: 3130

Re: Which class would you like to see in the Balance Forum?

Post#140 » Wed Jul 06, 2016 3:59 pm

I think people are just responding to us based on one post instead of reading the whole back and forth, like the zealot comment.

Im gonna go drink some zippy water hopefully the thread evolves into some new and exciting discussion later.
<Lords of the Locker Room> <Old School>

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests