Recent Topics

Ads

WP or RP?

Chat about everything else - ask questions, share stories, or just hang out.
User avatar
Kpi
Posts: 517

WP or RP?

Post#1 » Tue Jun 09, 2020 3:34 pm

Hi!

I have a slayer RR81, and i want try a healer. I'm thinking a WP or a RP. What is better and why?

Thank you
Spoiler:
Kpihuss -- WP 88
Kpithrogrim -- IB 83
Kpigaragrim -- Slayer 81
Kpikossar -- SW 77
Kpirmedes -- RP 68+
Kpiboris -- KOTBS 65+

Ads
User avatar
Arbich
Suspended
Posts: 788

Re: WP or RP?

Post#2 » Tue Jun 09, 2020 3:48 pm

RP is usually better than WP (maybe except for city and fort where WP has a slight edge). And WP is even more boring (in salv spec, which is best heal spec) than RP.

RP better cause: better resource management, better utility (WP has almost none), insane buffs to heal rune.

This is a good build for RP:

https://builder.returnofreckoning.com/c ... ,3847,3846


You can swap regenerative shielding for stoutness of Stone.
Arbich-BW/Xanthippe-WP/Schnipsel-AM

User avatar
Tamarlan
Posts: 209

Re: WP or RP?

Post#3 » Tue Jun 09, 2020 5:18 pm

Depending what gameplay you prefer.

For Cities and warband scale blob battles I see WP miles ahead of RP. Faster group heal and higher armor value help a lot when two blobs clash into each other.

But ... who can actually resist to play a sexy dwarf. RP is also fine and a lot of fun to play. Even after many years a well timed stagger still gives me a smile on my face.
Halvar RP
Halver SL
Halversen IB
Halva ENG

Zxul
Posts: 1890

Re: WP or RP?

Post#4 » Tue Jun 09, 2020 6:41 pm

Just ask yourself this- do you want to play a midget for a months to come?
"Can we play with him, master? He seems so unhappy. Let us help him smile. Please? Or at least let us carve one on his face when he stops screaming."

— Azeila, Alluress of Slaanesh

lyncher12
Posts: 542

Re: WP or RP?

Post#5 » Tue Jun 09, 2020 7:03 pm

Arbich wrote: Tue Jun 09, 2020 3:48 pm RP is usually better than WP (maybe except for city and fort where WP has a slight edge). And WP is even more boring (in salv spec, which is best heal spec) than RP.

RP better cause: better resource management, better utility (WP has almost none), insane buffs to heal rune.

This is a good build for RP:

https://builder.returnofreckoning.com/c ... ,3847,3846


You can swap regenerative shielding for stoutness of Stone.
if you are wearing vanquisher **

havartii
Posts: 452

Re: WP or RP?

Post#6 » Tue Jun 09, 2020 7:58 pm

WP group heal spam and Group cleanse make it better than any other . There are many viable ways to play it as well. Ruinie is a very good second heal for buffs and best single target burst heal and hots. Like above said runie has no resource management as wp mechanic takes some getting used to.
Order: 80 AM / 77 RP/ 75 Knight
Destro: 82 Sham / 80 Zealot/ 80 DoK

nuadarstark
Posts: 226

Re: WP or RP?

Post#7 » Thu Jun 11, 2020 11:22 am

Honestly? I think all 3 Order healers have their place and utility, plus are all fun as hell. RPs have great heals and tons of utility, WPs are team healing machines with ridiculous survivability (great armour, massive HP potential and AoE detaunt on CD? Yes please.) and solid utility & with the current morale bomb nerf, insta combat resing AMs are the **** in prolonged, sustained fights.
Raid boss Salv WP Guernios - rr83, full Sov
DPS SnB SM Valianoris - rr81, full Sov

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 15 guests