Mara vs WL
Ads
Re: Mara vs WL
Right on both counts. Bombing is a symptom of a problem, not its root. Accordingly, bombing itself should be left alone.
Marsares hit it dead-on on the previous page.
Marsares hit it dead-on on the previous page.
Re: Mara vs WL
Can't wait to see what the proposed changed to zone locks are going to be. Thursdays are essentially zerg nights where it doesn't even get to keep attacks or defenses because the huge destro blob never splits up to take BOs.
Navras INQUISITORS
Re: Mara vs WL
You want to play single target in the game of large scale battles with huge numbers of people from both sides, despise "AOE funneling" and want the game to be changed to fit your desired playstyle while going an extra mile to show that you are all in it for the better of everyone and somehow too possess the moral high ground in this.Marsares wrote:Spoiler:
Advocating for some fantasy equality of ST and AOE that will without a doubt ruin the game for one or the other in my opinion.
The game diverse with it's gameplay as it is, just class representation a bit struggling to be on par with other AOE speccs, and ST is already the way to go in small scale and SCs, so now why it is needed to make it relevant even in large scale battles. AOE will even fall a bit down in terms of damage with higher mitigation and healthpools of t4 and it is dominant force because it should be.
It's the ways where can you apply it should be addressed, ways of forcing massive zergs to split with some new ways of RvR campaign.
Вальтер Рыжий RU => Gaziraga BW, Valefar WL, Lovejoy
Retired
ex-Greenfire/Invasion RvR leader
Wonderful RvR music videos
Retired
ex-Greenfire/Invasion RvR leader
Wonderful RvR music videos

- spikespiegel84
- Posts: 303
Re: Mara vs WL
It remains a mystery to me the reason why people prefer bombing.
But fun is fun, as you get it it's not up to us to judge.
I'm only asking if someone can explain WHY you would willingly chose to stay in a single place, sometimes for hours in keep defense, and do the same thing all over again, instead moving and measure yourself with a lot of different situations, diverse tactics etc.
But fun is fun, as you get it it's not up to us to judge.
I'm only asking if someone can explain WHY you would willingly chose to stay in a single place, sometimes for hours in keep defense, and do the same thing all over again, instead moving and measure yourself with a lot of different situations, diverse tactics etc.

- roadkillrobin
- Posts: 2773
Re: Mara vs WL
The dmg nerf that took place in like 2010 I agree with. The problem at that point was that AoE did way to much dmg. a AoE 6man could stand toe to toe against a ST based 6man or 12 man and win. The 9 target cap limitation had almoast no effect on this.

Re: Mara vs WL
The main difference skillvise between smaller ST fights and larger bombing fights is target selection (ST) and coordinated movement (bombing). Claiming bombing "doesn't require skill" is a silly and obviously false statement. If that where the case no wb scale guild on live would have ever stood out as better or worse. Everyone that played in semi-serious wbs on live knows very well that there was a huge difference in the performance of various guilds and, no, that difference did not only come from setup.peterthepan3 wrote:Not really, but promoting other ways of playing is a good idea and bombing just doesn't require skill (whereas - believe it or not - even WoW pvp did, and was even ESL)
Nekkma / Hjortron
Zatakk
Smultron
Zatakk
Smultron
- peterthepan3
- Posts: 6509
Re: Mara vs WL
Bombing is not that taxing at all...our guild do it occasionally for lols and then stop due to boredom.
Don't get me wrong I am sure there are varying degrees of bombing skill; but as a whole it is a montonous playstyle that reaps maximum reward for little risk and user input.
Don't get me wrong I am sure there are varying degrees of bombing skill; but as a whole it is a montonous playstyle that reaps maximum reward for little risk and user input.

Ads
Re: Mara vs WL
the marauder and the wl are very well designed aoe classes and both (especially the wl) are taking the main dps role inside a bomb wb any time. it is really justified to discuss this matter here on now 3-4 pages. on a srs note: stop derailing and get an aoe topic going and discuss there. 10/10 would not read, here i get forced to it.
Re: Mara vs WL
Without meaning to sound derogatory, there are again major L2Read issues here. Perhaps English isn't your mother's tongue?Scrilian wrote: You want to play single target in the game of large scale battles with huge numbers of people from both sides, despise "AOE funneling" and want the game to be changed to fit your desired playstyle while going an extra mile to show that you are all in it for the better of everyone and somehow too possess the moral high ground in this.
Advocating for some fantasy equality of ST and AOE that will without a doubt ruin the game for one or the other in my opinion.
The game diverse with it's gameplay as it is, just class representation a bit struggling to be on par with other AOE speccs, and ST is already the way to go in small scale and SCs, so now why it is needed to make it relevant even in large scale battles. AOE will even fall a bit down in terms of damage with higher mitigation and healthpools of t4 and it is dominant force because it should be.
It's the ways where can you apply it should be addressed, ways of forcing massive zergs to split with some new ways of RvR campaign.
Pray tell where I said that the whole game should be revolved around my particular play-style, even more so when I said previously that I am in KO and both participate in WB, 6-men and solo roaming? I didn't promote nerfing of AOE bombing either, in fact I said that it's the zone mechanisms that promote blobbing, which in turn promote AOE. But, by all means, read what you will as your mind is set.
All I'm saying is that both AOE and ST should have a viable and equal role to play in RvR. Making this a reality is not a fantasy. It's only a fantasy in your mind because you can't divorce yourself from the idea that RvR is nothing more but 100vs100 blob battles. Battles in real life do not happen like that either. Yes, there are main forces clashing, but around them there are skirmishes, tactical smaller battles, 1v1s, etc.
There are four BOs for a reason, right? Why have the whole zone amalgamate and blob up on a single point, whilst ignoring the rest of the map. That should not be rewarded, and by not rewarding it and breaking up the mindless blobbing that some guilds (*cough*yours*cough*) advocate you give ST (like the WL) straight away a more rewarding role in RvR.
Last edited by Marsares on Fri Apr 22, 2016 12:52 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Karak-Norn /// Asildur - RR100 WL /// Marsares - RR95 AM /// Nirnaeth - RR64 SW
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Bing [Bot] and 15 guests