Implementation of a Queue
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Re: Implementation of a Queue
OMG! SOMEONE SUGGESTED SOMETHING! GET THE PITCHFORKS! I'LL BRING THE TAR AND FEATHERS!
Ads
Re: Implementation of a Queue
1) They JUST released t3.Nuitaran wrote:OMG! SOMEONE SUGGESTED SOMETHING! GET THE PITCHFORKS! I'LL BRING THE TAR AND FEATHERS!
2) They are not ignorant people, I'm sure they're working on a solution while monitoring the server for any leaks.
3) We ALL knew this would happen. If the server is not up to your standards, play on the other one? oh wait there's none.
4) Patience
Re: Implementation of a Queue
What's your point? Yeah okay they released T3 but what does that have to do with wanting a queue when you connect to a full server? Yes, we all knew the servers had a high chance of being full so what's wrong with suggesting a solution so you won't have to sit on character select for a random amount of time until you're lucky enough to log in?Renork wrote:1) They JUST released t3.Nuitaran wrote:OMG! SOMEONE SUGGESTED SOMETHING! GET THE PITCHFORKS! I'LL BRING THE TAR AND FEATHERS!
2) They are not ignorant people, I'm sure they're working on a solution while monitoring the server for any leaks.
3) We ALL knew this would happen. If the server is not up to your standards, play on the other one? oh wait there's none.
4) Patience

Re: Implementation of a Queue
Coryphaus wrote:A better solution if que is implemented:
when you join and you pick a toon on one realm then you try and join on a toon on the other realm you will get booted from the game and sent to the back of the que
which would result in a lot less xrelming
this is already the case, if you closely watch: the check to let you into the game is done when you choose your character to play, not when connecting to the server.
- Martock - Tiggo - Antigonos - Mago - Hamilkar - Melquart
- Smooshie (Destro)
- Smooshie (Destro)
Re: Implementation of a Queue
Chunky wrote:What's your point? Yeah okay they released T3 but what does that have to do with wanting a queue when you connect to a full server? Yes, we all knew the servers had a high chance of being full so what's wrong with suggesting a solution so you won't have to sit on character select for a random amount of time until you're lucky enough to log in?Renork wrote:1) They JUST released t3.Nuitaran wrote:OMG! SOMEONE SUGGESTED SOMETHING! GET THE PITCHFORKS! I'LL BRING THE TAR AND FEATHERS!
2) They are not ignorant people, I'm sure they're working on a solution while monitoring the server for any leaks.
3) We ALL knew this would happen. If the server is not up to your standards, play on the other one? oh wait there's none.
4) Patience
suggesting the obvious, just takes away forum space. Why do so many people think our devs are idiots?
- Martock - Tiggo - Antigonos - Mago - Hamilkar - Melquart
- Smooshie (Destro)
- Smooshie (Destro)
Re: Implementation of a Queue
Do you truly think our devs are brain dead?Chunky wrote:What's your point? Yeah okay they released T3 but what does that have to do with wanting a queue when you connect to a full server? Yes, we all knew the servers had a high chance of being full so what's wrong with suggesting a solution so you won't have to sit on character select for a random amount of time until you're lucky enough to log in?Renork wrote:1) They JUST released t3.Nuitaran wrote:OMG! SOMEONE SUGGESTED SOMETHING! GET THE PITCHFORKS! I'LL BRING THE TAR AND FEATHERS!
2) They are not ignorant people, I'm sure they're working on a solution while monitoring the server for any leaks.
3) We ALL knew this would happen. If the server is not up to your standards, play on the other one? oh wait there's none.
4) Patience
Re: Implementation of a Queue
Tiggo wrote: suggesting the obvious, just takes away forum space. Why do so many people think our devs are idiots?
I can't say, I don't know the developers.Renork wrote: Do you truly think our devs are brain dead?
The feedback is still valid, it's not in the game and I don't recall seeing a post telling us that they're working on it. This is also the first thread in Suggestion & Feedback suggesting a log-in queue when the servers are full, at which point I think that this topic has all the rights to exist.

Ads
Re: Implementation of a Queue
Rule number one of foruming for games. Ignore the @55holes that attack people for making suggestions. They are sad little trolls that have never accomplished anything in life, and certainly never managed to have anything resembling a creative thought so they feel the need to attack other people who do.
Re: Implementation of a Queue
Nuitaran wrote:Rule number one of foruming for games. Ignore the @55holes that attack people for making suggestions. They are sad little trolls that have never accomplished anything in life, and certainly never managed to have anything resembling a creative thought so they feel the need to attack other people who do.
Rule number 2: If you're losing an argument call them a nobody.
NOBODY!!!