SW 2h viable in later tiers?

Chat about everything else - ask questions, share stories, or just hang out.
User avatar
Twyxx
Posts: 934

Re: SW 2h viable in later tiers?

Post#41 » Fri Oct 16, 2015 4:18 pm

Thread derailed.
Image
Image
Image

Ads
KikkL
Banned
Posts: 263

Re: SW 2h viable in later tiers?

Post#42 » Fri Oct 16, 2015 4:20 pm

i had a SM in live i only used 2h, i kinda hate order in general but i made it to 40 with an AM as well, SM was a blast to play. I was defensive stacked with a 2h so dmg wasnt a concern but id still get killing blows and high dmg not due to bursts but staying alive over time.

PRobably doesnt answer your question just sharing :roll: :roll: :geek:

Penril
Posts: 4441

Re: SW 2h viable in later tiers?

Post#43 » Fri Oct 16, 2015 4:22 pm

Twyxx wrote:Thread derailed.
It all started with this silly post:
tomato wrote:We run sm/bo in our party atm. Best tanks ingame.

Bretin
Posts: 929

Re: SW 2h viable in later tiers?

Post#44 » Fri Oct 16, 2015 4:25 pm

Penril you played BO on live and you don't know anything about him yet, that's just sad. there is a real reason to run BO 100000 times over BG/Chosen, your kick or KD or whatever you mention can't compete. don't ask me for it i'm not gonna make it public but BO is broken right now even tho nobody will believe it.

as tomato said go fight us and we will show you how good BO is until then our group has his opinion while everyone else thinks both classes are < chosen/kotbs/bg/ib :)
Last edited by Bretin on Fri Oct 16, 2015 4:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
backrow
Posts: 144

Re: SW 2h viable in later tiers?

Post#45 » Fri Oct 16, 2015 4:26 pm

Nanji wrote:
Penril wrote:
tomato wrote:Uh you're speaking about us beeing forum warriors while you call a group you problably never fought bad.
(There is surely a saying for that in english which I can't seem to remember.)

Hope you and your group will show up for some fighting and not just talking on the forum. :)
Never played soccer against Micronesia but i know they are bad just from seeing them play. BTW, i didnt call YOU bad. I called THEM (order) bad. And i explained why.

I pointed several mistakes from Order in that video. And as i said, i never saw the BO do anything extraordinary.... care to point me to a exact time there where he does? Because that was your point, right? That you do excellent with a BO/SM, correct? From that video, i think you would have done even better if you had run a Chosen.

Chosen/BG>>>>>>>BO for group play.

Don't worry, i will be in touch next week.
You will bring your setup and we will bring ours, I just doubt that the bullshiting will stop after you lost. ;)
Not to imagine what will happen if we fail and you miraculously take a win from us. xD

In case you might loose I would advice you to learn this phrase "woulda coulda shoulda" it seems very popular amongst pen and paper warriors. :)
umm, where's all this hostility coming from, man? as a neutral party here you guys sure come off arrogant and with no good reason, at least from the video. that's not to say y'all aren't a bunch of good players, but geez. all he said is that other tanks are more optimal in his opinion, is all.

back on topic: SM seem to be doing okay damage for a SnB tank, I may just stick to that on my new guy. so far he does seem much more offensive than the Knight, in t1 he actually kills **** (granted, using a two hander atm)

foof
Posts: 142

Re: SW 2h viable in later tiers?

Post#46 » Fri Oct 16, 2015 4:32 pm

SMs and IBs tend to be the "most" viable 2h tanks in general.

WoDS alone allows a 2H SM to still have some nice defensive function.

Penril
Posts: 4441

Re: SW 2h viable in later tiers?

Post#47 » Fri Oct 16, 2015 4:32 pm

Bretin wrote:Penril you played BO on live and you don't know anything about him yet, that's just sad. there is a real reason to run BO 100000 times over BG/Chosen, your kick or KD or whatever you mention can't compete. don't ask me for it i'm not gonna make it public but BO is broken right now even tho nobody will believe it.

as tomato said go fight us and we will show you how good BO is until then our group has his opinion while everyone else thinks both classes are < chosen/kotbs/bg/ib :)
Cool story bro. Too bad i won't be able to see your super secret BO technique, since we play Destro (i mentioned i would be punting your SM like 2 pages ago).

Then again i'm sure SMs also have a super secret ultimate hidden technique, so all is good.
Last edited by Penril on Fri Oct 16, 2015 4:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Nanji
Posts: 312

Re: SW 2h viable in later tiers?

Post#48 » Fri Oct 16, 2015 4:33 pm

backrow wrote:
umm, where's all this hostility coming from, man? as a neutral party here you guys sure come off arrogant and with no good reason, at least from the video. that's not to say y'all aren't a bunch of good players, but geez. all he said is that other tanks are more optimal in his opinion, is all.

back on topic: SM seem to be doing okay damage for a SnB tank, I may just stick to that on my new guy. so far he does seem much more offensive than the Knight, in t1 he actually kills **** (granted, using a two hander atm)
People bring up balance issues when there is none, probably wasting devs time and creating negative images of certain classes.
All out of l2p issues. But people rather blame anything else before blaming themselves. :P
inactive on forums to avoid final ban

class imbalance = l2p issue

Ads
User avatar
Azarael
Posts: 5332

Re: SW 2h viable in later tiers?

Post#49 » Fri Oct 16, 2015 4:37 pm

Bretin wrote:don't ask me for it i'm not gonna make it public but BO is broken right now even tho nobody will believe it.
If this is due to a bug, I expect details within my PM inbox.

foof
Posts: 142

Re: SW 2h viable in later tiers?

Post#50 » Fri Oct 16, 2015 4:37 pm

Nanji wrote:
People bring up balance issues when there is none, probably wasting devs time and creating negative images of certain classes.
All out of l2p issues. But people rather blame anything else before blaming themselves. :P
This game has always had balance issues, most games do, which is why they are constantly being re-balanced. WAR's balance upon launch was significantly atrocious. It improved to some degree, but it isn't great by any means.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 4 guests