[World]
- Frontal AoEs will miss if the target is more than 10ft above or below you
and off topic but...
can we help in any way to fix instability for magus/eng

Thank you :>magter3001 wrote:This effects all.classes and I agree. If there is the slightest bump in the ground, my frontal aoe wouldn't work.
Doors do not currently have LoS checks.dkabib wrote:Well I don't see the fix working that well. I can still shoot AoE trough Mandred's Door.
Oh that's fine thenGenisaurus wrote:Doors do not currently have LoS checks.dkabib wrote:Well I don't see the fix working that well. I can still shoot AoE trough Mandred's Door.
This. Because of their dynamic nature, doors require additional information that would enable LOS checks to conditionally pass / fail for individual pieces of geometry. This is an important feature to have (and on the to-do list), but we felt that releasing sooner and without it was better than waiting.Genisaurus wrote:Doors do not currently have LoS checks.dkabib wrote:Well I don't see the fix working that well. I can still shoot AoE trough Mandred's Door.
Luuca wrote:... you forgot that in RoR, you must jump every seconds to exaggerate the Melee Distance Bug.
kintari wrote:This. Because of their dynamic nature, doors require additional information that would enable LOS checks to conditionally pass / fail for individual pieces of geometry. This is an important feature to have (and on the to-do list), but we felt that releasing sooner and without it was better than waiting.Genisaurus wrote:Doors do not currently have LoS checks.dkabib wrote:Well I don't see the fix working that well. I can still shoot AoE trough Mandred's Door.
Therefore, doors are actually deliberately filtered out of LOS geometry at the moment, because being blocked by empty space would be worse than continuing to be able to shoot through doors (but only doors). I also wanted to see how the system performed under load first before continuing on to dynamic keep doors.
As far as the original question, I agree that 10 ft seems overly restrictive now. Whether that means increasing the limit significantly or removing it altogether I don't know, but as far as I can remember this limit was only supposed to be a temporary measure.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests