Recent Topics

Ads

Destruction

Chat about everything else - ask questions, share stories, or just hang out.
User avatar
Luuca
Posts: 1204

Re: Destruction

Post#31 » Tue Sep 29, 2015 10:32 pm

bryanmatic wrote:I agree with azuzu " play the game you want to play " . Also with the order zerg daily it has chased away many old WAR player's . I am 1 of the last left playing from my alliance on LIVE . Something needs to change , add AAO something but order zerg every day and night is going to kill this game and become a 1 sided game . How fun is a pvp game with only 1 side playing ? A change need's to happen before it is to late !!!!!

"Be the change you wish to see in RoR."
-Az

Ads
User avatar
Grolar
Posts: 511

Re: Destruction

Post#32 » Tue Sep 29, 2015 10:45 pm

Luuca wrote: "Be the change you wish to see in RoR."
-Az
One of my favorite Ghandi quotes, and its how I live my life. :D

Sadly the server allows everyone else to be the change they want moment to moment and that messes with my inner peace and the server yin and yang. It think maybe its time for many unhappy players to take a break from RoR and not return until t4. At least then every class is closest to balanced.
Last edited by Grolar on Wed Sep 30, 2015 12:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
THUMP - "MEDIOCRE!!" ...Who's laughing now?

Image

User avatar
Luuca
Posts: 1204

Re: Destruction

Post#33 » Tue Sep 29, 2015 11:01 pm

Grolar wrote:
Luuca wrote: "Be the change you wish to see in RoR."
-Az
One of my favorite Ghandi quotes, and its how I live my life. :D

Sadly the server allows everyone else to be the change they want moment to moment and that messes with my inner peace and the server yin and yang. I think maybe its time for many unhappy players to take a break from RoR and not return until t4. At least then every class is closest to balanced.
By being the change of non-existent, T4 may not happen or if it does, it may not have the balance you desire because you were not here to be the change to balance you desire.

The only way we change what is going on in ORvR is to fight fire with fire. You cannot complain about order warbands rolling 6 mans at keeps if you have the opportunity to form up a 24 man yourself, but fail to do so.

During that one 18 hour period when Destro ruled the ORvR lakes, before the great Destro gear and medallion wipe of T2, many Destro players were saying to themselves - "Self, if order would just get their **** together, we'd have a fight".
As they rode their mounts from Keep to BO, to Keep PvEing. Don;t you imagine the Order players are thinking the same thing at this point.

And you know what? They are right. The Devs can;t fix this. Order can't fix this, XRealmers can't fix this. Only you can help prevent forrest fires! err. Form a warband and lead it to victory and glory.

Why you? Why not you?

skutrug
Posts: 131

Re: Destruction

Post#34 » Tue Sep 29, 2015 11:23 pm

Luuca wrote: I wish everyone would quit using the term Zerg to describe warbands of players all taking the same PvE objective or mowing down smaller, possibly less organized groups.
The 24 player warband is a part of the game. Superior numbers in battle has always been one way to help ensure victory.
I was being sarcastic about bringing the term zerg in my post. Yes superior numbers is a way for the weak to triumph over the strong, and most order warbands have 50% of players mounted on mules...
What order has done consistently, and I saw that clearly switching side after the "medallion incident", is efficiently and consistently organizing and leading pugs - Leading pugs is difficult, no doubt about it, but the reward is massive numbers... If all Destro want is running in premades, then WAR will mean playing scenarios for Destro, no matter how much AAO mechanics are implemented.
There is an art to running pug warbands, and few have it on the Destro side, because of a snobish attitude that it is somewhat of a "lesser form of leadership". It takes practice to corral a bunch of players toward the same goal, to keep them together in the face of defeat, to broadcast information to the chronically lost, and to make everybody feel like they are part of something...
But once that is done, these players come back nights after nights... on your side. They might not be the greatest PvPers or have the best equipment... but it does not matter, if they are twenty against one.
“You go to WAR with the Pugs you have, not the Premades you might want or wish you had”

User avatar
Grolar
Posts: 511

Re: Destruction

Post#35 » Wed Sep 30, 2015 1:22 am

Luuca wrote:
By being the change of non-existent, T4 may not happen or if it does, it may not have the balance you desire because you were not here to be the change to balance you desire.
City sieges may not happen soon, but I'm very confident t4 will be arriving in the coming months. The dev's are players and they're well aware of how to tweak this game and of the problems that come with it by now.
Luuca wrote:The only way we change what is going on in ORvR is to fight fire with fire. You cannot complain about order warbands rolling 6 mans at keeps if you have the opportunity to form up a 24 man yourself, but fail to do so.


I don't know where you heard this. It wasn't from me. A 6 man group could never take a keep from 24 people. That just ludicrous to think. Groups of people communicating in vent or teamspeak is another topic.
Luuca wrote:During that one 18 hour period when Destro ruled the ORvR lakes, before the great Destro gear and medallion wipe of T2, many Destro players were saying to themselves - "Self, if order would just get their **** together, we'd have a fight".
As they rode their mounts from Keep to BO, to Keep PvEing. Don;t you imagine the Order players are thinking the same thing at this point.

And you know what? They are right. The Devs can;t fix this. Order can't fix this, XRealmers can't fix this.

Why you? Why not you?

I don't know what order players were thinking and on that "one day". I don't care. You know why? Because anyone who has been playing on this server long enough knows that half of that medallion/devistator gear hunting destro zerg were those very same order players who complained the following day on the forums. Order players don't get to use that one day when xrealmers chose or planned or whatever to switch sides to justify what the pure destro players have to endure day in and day out. Stop using " Medallion Day " (tm) ;) as a platform to support some ridiculous argument. Order zerg are the same destro zerg. Hungry for fun, power and gear. That's it. Nothing more.

Xrealmers are part of the problem. They aren't a solution to balance, just a band-aid. All band-aids are meant to come off eventually. The dev's can fix it. The question is, when?

Luuca wrote:Only you can help prevent forrest fires!
huh? ...Nope, only smokey the bear can stop those.
THUMP - "MEDIOCRE!!" ...Who's laughing now?

Image

User avatar
Luuca
Posts: 1204

Re: Destruction

Post#36 » Wed Sep 30, 2015 1:55 am

Grolar wrote:... stuff and thangs...
I disagree with your assertion that large forces means zerg. This is supposed to be a large scale rvr game. hundreds versus hundreds. if you want to 6 man, like I do, then stay in your 6 man and run SCs and Orvr against superior numbers. Just don't complain about the opposition forces outnumbering your 6 man.

User avatar
Razid1987
Posts: 1295

Re: Destruction

Post#37 » Wed Sep 30, 2015 1:57 am

Luuca wrote:
Grolar wrote:... stuff and thangs...
I disagree with your assertion that large forces means zerg. This is supposed to be a large scale rvr game. hundreds versus hundreds. if you want to 6 man, like I do, then stay in your 6 man and run SCs and Orvr against superior numbers. Just don't complain about the opposition forces outnumbering your 6 man.
Agreed. Many people get the definition of zerging wrong:
"Nowadays term zerg is used in mmo games to describe force consisted of large group of lower level players (often with only basic equipment) who use numbers rather then strategy to defeat the enemy, therefore requiring no skill. This tactics is commonly known as zerging"

Source: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=zerg

Zymran
Posts: 6

Re: Destruction

Post#38 » Wed Sep 30, 2015 8:48 am

Can anyone enlighten me what IC means and why people are farming rats?

Ads
User avatar
Waaghaa
Posts: 215

Re: Destruction

Post#39 » Wed Sep 30, 2015 11:00 am

Inevitable City - Destro Capitol in game

The rats are farmed by both sides due to their level, higher level npc's, means gear in that level range when it drops.
Spoiler:
Image

Zymran
Posts: 6

Re: Destruction

Post#40 » Wed Sep 30, 2015 11:15 am

Waaghaa wrote:Inevitable City - Destro Capitol in game

The rats are farmed by both sides due to their level, higher level npc's, means gear in that level range when it drops.
Inevitable City. I should've known that. Thanks! :)

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Zingey3000 and 9 guests