Recent Topics

Ads

Tank Survivability: Are Defensive Builds Rewarded Enough?

Share your ideas and feedback to help improve the game.
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.

This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.

To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Jajcek12
Posts: 115

Re: Tank Survivability: Are Defensive Builds Rewarded Enough?

Post#31 » Tue Sep 08, 2026 7:36 pm

End of ballance change shows how tanks core mechanics and abbilities are archaic.
They ware design into mdps focused game. 6 target frontal cone of fire 30/40 ft of range.
Guard challange ware suited for that.
Modern conducting of battle is 24 target 360 degree cone of fire 100 ft range on averege.
Moste of tanks abbilities ware design in previous environment, we dont have abbilities mechanics that keep tank engaging or effective in modern fights.
(Few examples above)
Sure they are good for scenarios environment where situations is closest to what are those abbilities design for.
There is gap that could be filled with new ideas.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests