Stinksuit wrote: Wed Aug 27, 2025 9:37 am
I mostly agree with what you say in here but while solo is often times just rock paper scissors there is definitely skill involved to it aswell. If there wasn't then you'd never win any bad match ups. I think Daewuur mentioned it already that there are quite many variables to soloing in orvr iirc. Like builds, classes, who gets the opener, gear, what morales you play etc.
Personally I'm with you when you say that 6v6 is the highest skill ceiling in the game but it is like you said, its just super boring to watch, so often times solo content is what people tend to enjoy watching.
Imo skill in this game is also not the easiest to measure. Like how do you see if someone is good or bad? Some warband players might do great in orvr 24v24 but are terrible in solo. But solo players might be useless for group play on the contrary.. xD then again solo "skill" doesn't really reflect anything because as you mentioned its often times just predetermined by your class matchup and also the fact that this game is a team based game.
Yes, indeed, dont missunderstand me - of course there is a skill involved in soloroaming, its very debatable but for me its one of the most skillful things, the GCD management. Its just while you solo roam and do 1vX you only accountable for your own action while 6v6 requires a full team coordination, how a go looks like, everyone prepares for CC, dps pulling out short versions of their bursts according to situation, healers do their cc/silence (and its very very tricky, cause other healers are not dumb bots and they see you doing a go so they do everything to deny you and avoid getting staggered/silenced) and its actually like a synchroswimming. Everything has to be done as a team. While solo roaming you are just on your own.
Agree that skill is not properly measurable, its amazing to watch e.g. kryun play on his BG or Halta doing wonders on book WP or if anyone ever managed to play with e.g. Hao, Tion, Wam, Teinhala, Advar (could name a ton more, but mostly those are way too long no active, sorry to everyone who i didnt specifically mention, its would take like 9/10 of the post if i mention everyone) or other exceptional leaders would clearly know what great MA looks like and how much its gamechanging if you have a great lead. Its literally seems like 90% of the succes if MA/lead is great. You pin down the issue of many absolutely exceptional solo roamers who are insanely great with their GCD management, alike mdpv who i doubt is actually being a human being (especially due to being so cold hearted in his videos, thats absolutely insane how calm he is in so dire situations of 1v6(!!!!!) for example) cause the way he plays in soloroam is just godlike but we havent seen him doing serious groups. There are tho other examples of the old, like Eathisword (Volgograd, the IB), who is known as incredibly great solo roamer plus amazing 6v6 player.
Environments do matter, like you mention 24v24, ive been myself into GvG which were done for funz (greatest ones but my team lost them all, most amazings were when Hao was active, game was so much better with such people), the serious one, or just training. Its all so different if you change the perspective and the scale of the fight.
So yes, there is very none transparent measures of how someone is good or bad. And second the thesis that skill doesnt reflect anything because sometimes its just a feature of the enviroment and fight itself (be it 1v1, 1vX, sc, 6v6, 24v24, orvr etc).