Huge price cause one of those is mandatory in any build. And ranked had a decent amount of participants for a few seasons, if you check leaderboards you will see about 2-3 hundreds of players, after excluding alts. That being said, ring requiring ranked was a skill gate: you had to learn a very different style of playing and commit a lot of time and effort to get it. Price is an attempt to quantify that skill requirement, and some argue it's not high enough precisely because you can't quantify skill: the item itself used to signify proficiency, now it's no longer the case.Avernus wrote: Wed Nov 30, 2022 4:55 am1. Yes.Cyrylius wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 3:55 pm 1. It's not endgame stat wise, it gives (by itself) much less than sov jewels.
2. Its cost comes from the fact that its one of two gear pieces you can slot special talismans on, and those are not tied to renown. Just like sentinel ring has no price by itself, as a matter of fact, and used to be much harder to obtain.
3. Those are two most unique gear pieces in game, and you can't compare their price to anything else.
4. And that's without considering the whole ranked part.
2. Not exactly - it's an oppurtunity to mix a set bonuses from a set that is better than sentinel without losing an opportunity to slot special talisman.
3. Indeed. And the most unique feature of this gear - it's huge price.
4. To be honest - i do not care about ranked at all, all this "6vs6" requires to adjust some classes to be useful in ranked. Obviously, this can (will...or is it already happened?) lead to the balance problems in RvR. This game is RvR, not an 6vs6 arena right?. And this ranked is kinda...feels dead. (and should be dead). This is my (totally biased) opinion about ranked.
Orvr ring could maybe require winning City instances as a 24 man, but I think its too late to make this change now.