Recent Topics

Ads

Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Chat about everything else - ask questions, share stories, or just hang out.
geezereur
Posts: 672

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#61 » Tue Nov 29, 2022 2:16 am

I just got mine it took some time but I think its ok.

Ads
User avatar
wachlarz
Posts: 798

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#62 » Tue Nov 29, 2022 9:22 am

So who make new char and grind all crest ? Not old char with 50k crest and sov from city when items drop ?

Avernus
Posts: 391

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#63 » Tue Nov 29, 2022 10:55 am

Basically, everyone who already bought this says that it's ok just farm like i did. The ones who didn't bought this yet (me too), obviously, gonna say that this price is inadequate.

To the ones who are saying that this is endgame gear - stop this nonsence pls. Endgame gear it's sovereign. And you must have max RR to wear full set even if you have it in your pocket.
Can't say the same about this set though. Does it require you to be around 80 RR? No.

You can buy other set pieces for a reasonable price - but not the bloody trinket because you can't buy the last piece of this set (which isn't even top set at the moment) because of this so called "price" (and we should be thankful that there is no need to farm this dead ranking? yeah sure...)

Just think about it - you farm for your sovereign (actual top gear, you must be around 80 to wear it) and then you gonna farm for some lower lvl set (reasonable price for armor parts) to mix it up and get the trinket which DOES NOT actually require you to be around 80 RR (TOP right? right?!) but costs like your full top set? Really?!

Make this set for 80RR and i won't say anything about this price.
Last edited by Avernus on Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

lemao
Posts: 365

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#64 » Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:21 am

Avernus wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 10:55 am Basically, everyone who already bought this says that it's ok just farm like i did. The ones who didn't bought this yet (me too), obviously, gonna say that this price is inadequate.

To the ones who are saying that this is endgame gear - stop this nonsence pls. Endgame gear it's sovereign. And you must have max RR to wear full set even if you have it in your pocket.
Can't say the same about this set though. Does it requare you to be around 80 RR? No.

You can buy other set pieces for a reasonable price - but not the bloody trinket because you can't buy the last piece of this set (which isn't even top set at the moment) because of this so called "price" (and we should be thankful that there is no need to farm this dead ranking? yeah sure...)

Just think about it - you farm for your sovereign (actual top gear, you must be around 80 to wear it) and then you gonna farm for some lower lvl set (reasonable price for armor parts) to mix it up and get the trinket which DOES NOT actually require you to be around 80 RR (TOP right? right?!) but costs like your full top set? Really?!

Make this set for 80RR and i won't say anything about this price.
Why should it be changed to RR80 ?
By the time you farm your 10 k crests for the ring you will be rr 80 + automatically anyways, probably even rr 83 +...It literally doesnt matter if you change the requirement to wear the ring to rr 80.

Avernus
Posts: 391

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#65 » Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:37 am

lemao wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:21 am Why should it be changed to RR80 ?
By the time you farm your 10 k crests for the ring you will be rr 80 + automatically anyways, probably even rr 83 +...It literally doesnt matter if you change the requirement to wear the ring to rr 80.
Because the only more or less acceptable reason for this price to exist is to have it on endgame gear. 80 RR is good for endgame gear. As it is now - it's overcosted nonsense.

User avatar
Keula
Posts: 133

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#66 » Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:09 pm

Avernus wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:37 am
lemao wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:21 am Why should it be changed to RR80 ?
By the time you farm your 10 k crests for the ring you will be rr 80 + automatically anyways, probably even rr 83 +...It literally doesnt matter if you change the requirement to wear the ring to rr 80.
Because the only more or less acceptable reason for this price to exist is to have it on endgame gear. 80 RR is good for endgame gear. As it is now - it's overcosted nonsense.
So you think that it's "overcosted nonsense", but if the requirement was rr80 with no stat changes it would suddenly not be anymore? Rank requirements don't really mean much, you can wear full bloodlord at rank 40 no matter the RR or should we make the bloodlord weapon rr80 as it's bis for most dps?
Alteredheal 85 DOK
Azerrad 80 Sorc
Lumoojatar 71 AM

User avatar
Phantasm
Posts: 739

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#67 » Tue Nov 29, 2022 12:38 pm

People keep confusing endgame gear with BIS. Sov is, yes, highest RR requirement set but BIS are those which complement your gear - for dps classes Tri ring is a carrot and reward. Price is fine if u play actively, no log to overpopulated side and get like 10 crests for taken keep. Play smart and u get it within weeks.

SuperStar
Posts: 403

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#68 » Tue Nov 29, 2022 1:00 pm

I think the solution is the account based warcrests.

Its prvented the ppl the make multi account.

And we may see more alts and returners.

Also i hope the meta will change frequently and its more healthy if we can adapt easly.

And many of us sitting a lot of warcrat and we cannot do with them anything.

I already told make expensive unique alternative apprentice. Also you can sold the past event reward for expensive.

Ads
User avatar
Cyrylius
Posts: 404

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#69 » Tue Nov 29, 2022 3:55 pm

Avernus wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:37 am
lemao wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:21 am Why should it be changed to RR80 ?
By the time you farm your 10 k crests for the ring you will be rr 80 + automatically anyways, probably even rr 83 +...It literally doesnt matter if you change the requirement to wear the ring to rr 80.
Because the only more or less acceptable reason for this price to exist is to have it on endgame gear. 80 RR is good for endgame gear. As it is now - it's overcosted nonsense.
It's not endgame stat wise, it gives (by itself) much less than sov jewels. Its cost comes from the fact that its one of two gear pieces you can slot special talismans on, and those are not tied to renown. Just like sentinel ring has no price by itself, as a matter of fact, and used to be much harder to obtain. Those are two most unique gear pieces in game, and you can't compare their price to anything else. And that's without considering the whole ranked part.
RoR doesnt deserve being taken seriously.

Avernus
Posts: 391

Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost

Post#70 » Wed Nov 30, 2022 4:55 am

Cyrylius wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 3:55 pm 1. It's not endgame stat wise, it gives (by itself) much less than sov jewels.
2. Its cost comes from the fact that its one of two gear pieces you can slot special talismans on, and those are not tied to renown. Just like sentinel ring has no price by itself, as a matter of fact, and used to be much harder to obtain.
3. Those are two most unique gear pieces in game, and you can't compare their price to anything else.
4. And that's without considering the whole ranked part.
1. Yes.
2. Not exactly - it's an oppurtunity to mix a set bonuses from a set that is better than sentinel without losing an opportunity to slot special talisman.
3. Indeed. And the most unique feature of this gear - it's huge price.
4. To be honest - i do not care about ranked at all, all this "6vs6" requires to adjust some classes to be useful in ranked. Obviously, this can (will...or is it already happened?) lead to the balance problems in RvR. This game is RvR, not an 6vs6 arena right?. And this ranked is kinda...feels dead. (and should be dead). This is my (totally biased) opinion about ranked.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests