Regarding the item customization exploits
Re: Regarding the item customization exploits
I think most ppl do it more for graphic bug than have an advanatge, that's why i suggested to make appereance system more freely in future (freely does not mean nonesense)

Ads
Re: Regarding the item customization exploits
Do you really think this is for apperance? This player is exploiting the harder hitting DPS off-hand weapon meant to be for a class way weaker than the one he is using. Could un-equipt it, or report it, instead he use it for PvP with advantage, in this case a huge one.Tesq wrote:I think most ppl do it more for graphic bug than have an advanatge, that's why i suggested to make appereance system more freely in future (freely does not mean nonesense)
Spoiler:
- jonathanmurphy3
- Posts: 266
Re: Regarding the item customization exploits
Oh ****, we better ban him then - right?
You want a project that has 500-1000 players to start kicking people for doing harmless **** that will get fixed? Get good.
You want a project that has 500-1000 players to start kicking people for doing harmless **** that will get fixed? Get good.
Spoiler:
Re: Regarding the item customization exploits
DONT YOU EVER TRY TO SPEAK TO ME AGAIN. Your absolutely selfish way to throw stones and hide the hand against any form of good behaviour, this time againt my guild, arent gonna be forgotten, man. Your way to try to discredit any person that try to solve the things u exploit is hateable and can be easily tracked in ur post's history.jonathanmurphy3 wrote:Oh ****, we better ban him then - right?
You want a project that has 500-1000 players to start kicking people for doing harmless **** that will get fixed? Get good.
I disliked you. Now i directly hate you. You named my guild-mates racists. You tried to blame the good name of my guild. You can't say the same about the name of your guild, that is widely regarded, with probes, a lot, as exploiters and bad loosers.
This is, and will be, by last answer ever to you.
Spoiler:
Re: Regarding the item customization exploits
ototo if i dont miss something , that weapon have less strengh than the primary weapon but 2 wep dps more, i see more like he wants to play dps but want do it with 1 hand only, cos i tryed chosen too with 1 hand and he was cool. I condam btw the other type of behaviour if what you told are true.

Re: Regarding the item customization exploits
You think too much good from that. There is quite a difference between playing around with 1h weapons and equipping the best DPS off-hand weapon. He is clearly hitting harder, thats why is equipping that instead of taking it out.Tesq wrote:ototo if i dont miss something , that weapon have less strengh than the primary weapon but 2 wep dps more, i see more like he wants to play dps but want do it with 1 hand only, cos i tryed chosen too with 1 hand and he was cool.
On a side note, i do play also my KoBS with 1h only sometimes, out of PvP, for the feeling. Im allways tempted to do so in PvP also, sorta duelist


Spoiler:
Re: Regarding the item customization exploits
call that kobs felix and here you go!!
btw the auto attack speed of the primary weapon does not change also the chance of the second weapon to proc an auto attack.
the exchange of 2 strenght for 2 wep dps it's like 1.6 dps more and 1.2 damage reduction from tough.
Maybe i think too good of him or there are ppl that exploit things to get just lol buff but i hardly see this as an exploit that achive significantly benefith to the game for him or his realm, as stated in the rule:
Due to the nature of this project, bugs and glitches can and will arise, some of which may interfere significantly with gameplay, or offer major advantage to either you, your group or your faction. Exploiting such issues will be viewed as cheating, unless an exception has been made. Any exceptions will be announced in the forum.
This is not an huge advanatge and so should not considered as cheating. Just my opinion . I would be more intransigent with ppl that use bugs to go over the rvr barraks than this.
btw the auto attack speed of the primary weapon does not change also the chance of the second weapon to proc an auto attack.
the exchange of 2 strenght for 2 wep dps it's like 1.6 dps more and 1.2 damage reduction from tough.
Maybe i think too good of him or there are ppl that exploit things to get just lol buff but i hardly see this as an exploit that achive significantly benefith to the game for him or his realm, as stated in the rule:
Due to the nature of this project, bugs and glitches can and will arise, some of which may interfere significantly with gameplay, or offer major advantage to either you, your group or your faction. Exploiting such issues will be viewed as cheating, unless an exception has been made. Any exceptions will be announced in the forum.
This is not an huge advanatge and so should not considered as cheating. Just my opinion . I would be more intransigent with ppl that use bugs to go over the rvr barraks than this.
Last edited by Tesq on Wed Jun 10, 2015 9:54 am, edited 1 time in total.

Re: Regarding the item customization exploits
I think you're getting ahead of yourself there. I was talking about not reading the rules post you linked. Ego's and rage going berserk in this thread.Luth wrote:But still you replied to it. Must be the third eye or something.labotimy wrote: lol didn't read that post.
I did. But probably you don't know that, as you didn't read that post.labotimy wrote:look at the screenshot.
Ads
- magter3001
- Posts: 1284
Re: Regarding the item customization exploits
Well this is disappointing.
Aza just allowed exploiters of a bug off the hook. Huge advantage or not, the people that do this are deliberately ABUSING a bug. I understand if they did it once or twice to test the bug and report it but to actively abuse the bug again and again, day after day. week after week, huge advantage or not, should not be tolerated in this community. Should the people be banned? Hell no, but they should get a warning and be forced to stop the exploitation of a bug., whatever it happens to be.
Aza can say all he wants about it being fixed in a future patch but that doesn't change the abuse of the bug currently. If anything, this gives people leeway for further exploitation of "minor" advantageous bugs in the future.
/EDIT
After reading over again, I realized that there wasn't a real advantage from the weapons people used. My big gripe was that I thought those people were getting an advantage, minor or not, instead of realizing that most of them just "want to look cool". Instead I was more worried that the devs were allowing people to abuse bugs, of any sort, if it's ONLY a minor reason. Personally I wish I was more level headed when posting the comment above.
Aza just allowed exploiters of a bug off the hook. Huge advantage or not, the people that do this are deliberately ABUSING a bug. I understand if they did it once or twice to test the bug and report it but to actively abuse the bug again and again, day after day. week after week, huge advantage or not, should not be tolerated in this community. Should the people be banned? Hell no, but they should get a warning and be forced to stop the exploitation of a bug., whatever it happens to be.
Aza can say all he wants about it being fixed in a future patch but that doesn't change the abuse of the bug currently. If anything, this gives people leeway for further exploitation of "minor" advantageous bugs in the future.
/EDIT
After reading over again, I realized that there wasn't a real advantage from the weapons people used. My big gripe was that I thought those people were getting an advantage, minor or not, instead of realizing that most of them just "want to look cool". Instead I was more worried that the devs were allowing people to abuse bugs, of any sort, if it's ONLY a minor reason. Personally I wish I was more level headed when posting the comment above.

Last edited by magter3001 on Wed Jun 10, 2015 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Agrot 35/40 Aggychopp 32/40
Grelin of Magnus/Badlands
Grelin of Magnus/Badlands

Re: Regarding the item customization exploits
tryhard scrub telling other's to get good?jonathanmurphy3 wrote:Oh ****, we better ban him then - right?
You want a project that has 500-1000 players to start kicking people for doing harmless **** that will get fixed? Get good.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 11 guests