Given the recent proposed changes to WPs/DoKs who now (apparently) have 3 viable specs heal/dps-heal/DPS, where does this leave tanks?
Will tanks ever have a way to sacrifice their main role/characteristics (Guard, survivability and CC), to take a pure DPS spec. In the same way healers can?
Viable pure DPS spec for tanks (future)?
Ads
Re: Viable pure DPS spec for tanks (future)?
Or just give us a toggle so we can have our defensive stats transferred into offensive ones, and go from tanky to spanky. If other classes can totally swap their play style at the click of a toggle or the change of a stance, why should we be shoe-horned into a singular play style unless we respec the lot?
Karak-Norn /// Asildur - RR100 WL /// Marsares - RR95 AM /// Nirnaeth - RR64 SW
- BrockRiefenstahl
- Posts: 409
Re: Viable pure DPS spec for tanks (future)?
Playing a 2h Tanks specced for DPS is due to one reason:
Staying still pretty tanky + do decent up to almost equal dps than a Melee (depends on Career).
So there is no need for any sort of toggle. I really dont understand why people are so desperate about WP/DoK changes.
Its still under adjustment and it finally fits to their god damn class description. If you want to go glasscanon as Tank you can do it. No need for a toggle.
Staying still pretty tanky + do decent up to almost equal dps than a Melee (depends on Career).
So there is no need for any sort of toggle. I really dont understand why people are so desperate about WP/DoK changes.
Its still under adjustment and it finally fits to their god damn class description. If you want to go glasscanon as Tank you can do it. No need for a toggle.
Re: Viable pure DPS spec for tanks (future)?
Archetype breaking should only be done where the spec only has a place if it is performed (such as on DPS WP). I don't believe tanks fall in this category - SM certainly doesn't, nor BO.
Re: Viable pure DPS spec for tanks (future)?
Because need 4 normal dps to kill dok with guard and he hit harder than we.BrockRiefenstahl wrote:
I really dont understand why people are so desperate about WP/DoK changes.
Its still under adjustment and it finally fits to their god damn class description.
- BrockRiefenstahl
- Posts: 409
Re: Viable pure DPS spec for tanks (future)?
Spoiler:
When I see arguments, that are completely making my points invalide, I accept them and try to rethink my own concept and do research about what and WHY I did not get that idea in the first place.
For me it seems you are a cryer/market screamer.
One who got his fix pattern in gameplay and not the will nor the skill to adapt.
In addition you seem to be learning resistant. So I can only wish you a fine day at this point.
Hopefully Devs will never listen to you.
Re: Viable pure DPS spec for tanks (future)?
Just play a sm, you can fulfil your role as a tank and have the damage output of a dps class all in one 
Morfee - Shaman / Mynnos - Kotbs / Grubod - Black Orc / Snubz - Squig Herder
- altharion1
- Banned
- Posts: 321
Re: Viable pure DPS spec for tanks (future)?
Ok, so instead would you consider buffing/re-working Focused Offense in the balance section?Azarael wrote:Archetype breaking should only be done where the spec only has a place if it is performed (such as on DPS WP). I don't believe tanks fall in this category - SM certainly doesn't, nor BO.
Ads
Re: Viable pure DPS spec for tanks (future)?
If you want to put a proposal up, go ahead, but be prepared to meet fierce resistance because of opinions about the present state of MDPS.
- TenTonHammer
- Posts: 3806
Re: Viable pure DPS spec for tanks (future)?
Kali14 wrote:Because need 4 normal dps to kill dok with guard and he hit harder than we.BrockRiefenstahl wrote:
I really dont understand why people are so desperate about WP/DoK changes.
Its still under adjustment and it finally fits to their god damn class description.
Only at the current gear perhaps
down the line with stronger sets true dps classes will hit even harder

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 5 guests



