warislove wrote:@Penril
point was that if you give an argument to a change it doesnt matter bcs there are 5 ppl with their shiny wall of text arguing their side of the story and they get their way more often than not...
example: 10 ppl that cant understand how to fight against guard/super punt will qq how its unfair to have those abilities in the way that they are and will cry for their change (and in this case they are not considered whiners?) if they are vocal enough the changes that they want will be implemented...without them maybe try to understand the system and work around guard/punt...(or insert random ability that average player cba to understand)
maybe im wrong about this but when i played on live and got destroyed by someone my plan was to get better and to not cry how someone is OP
Have you ever been on the balance fourms
its not just causal posting; you have to make legitimate, well constructed arguments as to why X is an issue and what changes should be made
And secondly the devs here arnt idiots that will just bend over for any complaint post made
Lastly its not the fault of the devs that the balance discussions have more or less the same people are posting in them, clearly only some are will to make the effort to contribute while others just think this is live and only log on to the game to play.
If you cant bother to contribute to the project and make the effort to post then your opions arnt going to be heard
