Proc meta

[dur3al]

At the moment, we don't have a source for the ICD on any given proc. As far as I know, Londo hasn't yet uncovered that information, though I may be wrong.

If you can find a reliable source, or person, for the ICD of various procs, I will be more than happy to fix them across the board.

Thank you for your reply! Will try my best!

[Kattastrof]

Bw and Wp did not have icd on live. Used increased proc tactic, coordinated strike and leonine frenzy for fun 1 day. My combat log was full of procs. It was a fun thing but good? Not with rr100 oponents

[dur3al]

That was only damage from 1 slayer btw. Flames of Rhuin proccing off Reckless Gamble, and I believe procs are proccing other procs, that's how it is supposed to be like this?

Cheers,

[Azarael]

Nothing in there is a proc proccing another proc. Procs are only invoked on direct damage.

[Toldavf]

It's likely that the actual info from live wont be found so some time in the far future RoR will have to make its own decision on if procs should have icd and how long it should be.

[Niky]

I have +50% AA, but i have more damage from FOR.

P.S: I think 2sec ICD its good for Covenants and sorc/bw buffs.

[Niky]

Thats procs realy break game now.

Maybe u can turn off all Covenants, Prayer and sorc/bw buffs, while u looking for reliable source, or person, for the ICD of various procs.

[dur3al]

From regular skills I received 372 dmg with 428 dmg mitigated.
From buff procs I received 586 dmg with 298 dmg mitigated.

So more then half the dps is coming from "rng" procs :/ Sad times..

On live I guess this didn't do much a difference because of higher wounds/gear stats.

[Niky]

Not bad damage for full def group?
No damage from skills, all damage only from procs.

[peterthepan3]

It is very cheesetastic tbh.