Since you fail to counter my arguments with anything other than "I'm right you're wrong"...I am done replying. Cheers.bloodi wrote:What?Tankbeardz wrote:You are completely missing the point. I hate to digress..to "this is a L2P issue"...but this is an issue of group coordination and skill that a nerf bat won't fix -- no matter how many times you swing it.
You are replying this to a post with a quote where you are doing it, are you serious? I will copy it again for good measure:Tankbeardz wrote:When did I ever dismiss your argument by stating that I am right and you are ignorant?
If you are going to feign ignorance, at least delete the quote.Tankbeardz wrote:So you are dismissing group play in general in favor of nerfs/buffs to suit your particular needs. Gotcha.
This may be the last example of how a debate works, you are just repeating the same thing while i refute it and you cover your ears. Hell, you went and said it again to Jaycub like in the next post like nothing was ever said to you.Tankbeardz wrote:This is how a debate works. Your turn.
None of this even works if the target just stands near the Tank, which he should be doing anyway.Tankbeardz wrote:You also have snare, KD, Stagger, Champs Challenge...to name a few.
He is not saying is wrong, he is saying that the only counter to a guard is either punt or burst.Vigfuss wrote:You have to get off this idea that attacking a guarded target is wrong. That idea only works if you play against pugs. And you left IB punt off your list too, no idea why really. At the highest level of 6v6 most kills are made thru guard, because the tanks are good at swapping guard and the debuffing and focusfire is really strong.
How many times more have we to repeat it?
Overarching balance changes
-
- Posts: 629
Re: Overarching balance changes
Ads
Re: Overarching balance changes
lol Bloodi. If you suggest something you have to actually listen to what someone else has to say about it.bloodi wrote:Do you realize that you basically are saying "Well you can swap targets, you could also swap targets or well, you could burst them while using cc"Tankbeardz wrote:1. Focus CC / Snare 1 Tank then kill his guarded target - move to healers when they are focused on rez / re-heal and the dead target has a debuff. Sometimes you have to focus the strongest DPS sometimes you have to focus the healer
2. Constantly swap to the weakest target and move the battle to the back lines
3. Save morales then coordinate CC and burst them down (Champ Challenge, ID, etc.)
4. If the 2h is squishy enough focus him then his guarded target
5. And on and on..fights are dynamic...not static
This constantly changes throughout the battle depending on how the other group reacts, of course...
Fusscle of Critical Acclaim
Re: Overarching balance changes
None of those things remove or diminish the effect of gaurd, none of them are a hard counter.Tankbeardz wrote:
You also have snare, KD, Stagger, Champs Challenge...to name a few.
I really like how you omit my opening statement from my post in your quote of me.Vigfuss wrote:
You have to get off this idea that attacking a guarded target is wrong. That idea only works if you play against pugs. And you left IB punt off your list too, no idea why really. At the highest level of 6v6 most kills are made thru guard, because the tanks are good at swapping guard and the debuffing and focusfire is really strong.
Spoiler:
♂ ♂ ♂ <Lords of the Locker Room> ♂ ♂ ♂ <Old School> ♂ ♂ ♂
-
- Posts: 629
Re: Overarching balance changes
No, but they allow you to move the battle elsewhere, allowing the DPS to focus another target.Jaycub wrote:None of those things remove or diminish the effect of gaurd, none of them are a hard counter.Tankbeardz wrote:
You also have snare, KD, Stagger, Champs Challenge...to name a few.
I really like how you omit my opening statement from my post in your quote of me.Vigfuss wrote:
You have to get off this idea that attacking a guarded target is wrong. That idea only works if you play against pugs. And you left IB punt off your list too, no idea why really. At the highest level of 6v6 most kills are made thru guard, because the tanks are good at swapping guard and the debuffing and focusfire is really strong.
Spoiler:
Re: Overarching balance changes
oops lol sorry about that. My point is that you put more emphasis on that than what is really necessary.Jaycub wrote:None of those things remove or diminish the effect of gaurd, none of them are a hard counter.Tankbeardz wrote:
You also have snare, KD, Stagger, Champs Challenge...to name a few.
I really like how you omit my opening statement from my post in your quote of me.Vigfuss wrote:
You have to get off this idea that attacking a guarded target is wrong. That idea only works if you play against pugs. And you left IB punt off your list too, no idea why really. At the highest level of 6v6 most kills are made thru guard, because the tanks are good at swapping guard and the debuffing and focusfire is really strong.
Spoiler:
Fusscle of Critical Acclaim
Re: Overarching balance changes
Tankbeardz wrote:
No, but they allow you to move the battle elsewhere, allowing the DPS to focus another target.
You are gonna have to come up with some kind of example, i don't see how moving the battle elsewhere is going to stop the tanks from guarding people unless we are talking pugs or groups without voice comms where DPS would overextend into as situation where they tanks weren't able to keep up with them due to a snare/kd/stagger. But voice comms stops that from ever happening, or just a good battle field awareness.
♂ ♂ ♂ <Lords of the Locker Room> ♂ ♂ ♂ <Old School> ♂ ♂ ♂
Re: Overarching balance changes
Guard isn't to strong no evidence has been provided for this not a single thing.
There is actually hard facts that contradicts the claim that guard is to strong.
The best teams and I mean the ones saying guard is fine score kills on each other 6v6 in CW by countering guard. Vs pugs we don't even use punt just like vigfuss tries to tell you.
Nerfing guard could be a question if we had a lot of 0 kills CWs but we don't.
There is actually hard facts that contradicts the claim that guard is to strong.
The best teams and I mean the ones saying guard is fine score kills on each other 6v6 in CW by countering guard. Vs pugs we don't even use punt just like vigfuss tries to tell you.
Nerfing guard could be a question if we had a lot of 0 kills CWs but we don't.
Last edited by Bozzax on Mon Jul 11, 2016 5:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.
A reasonable RvR system that could make the majority happy http://imgur.com/HL6cgl7
-
- Posts: 629
Re: Overarching balance changes
Good 6v6 healers are usually good kiters that are spread way out, far away from the battle.Jaycub wrote:Tankbeardz wrote:
No, but they allow you to move the battle elsewhere, allowing the DPS to focus another target.
You are gonna have to come up with some kind of example, i don't see how moving the battle elsewhere is going to stop the tanks from guarding people unless we are talking pugs or groups without voice comms where DPS would overextend into as situation where they tanks weren't able to keep up with them due to a snare/kd/stagger. But voice comms stops that from ever happening, or just a good battle field awareness.
If you lock 1 tank down that means the other tank is now responsible for 2 healers and 1 dps. He can't keep all 3 alive.
If you can cc the dps that was guarded by that tank (snare and punt) you will kill him or force him to run back to his guard and negating a big chunk of dps while making the remaining tank responsible for keeping 2 dps and 2 healers alive. The rest really depends on the reaction of the other group.....most will sprint + stam pot to catch up to a target that is far away.
This is only 1 scenario that plays out in 6v6, of course, and 2 good groups can go on for 30 minutes+, easily. Eventually, someone will fall.
Ads
Re: Overarching balance changes
If guard isn't so strong, then why are some many people opposed to making changes to it.
-= Agony =-
- peterthepan3
- Posts: 6509
Re: Overarching balance changes
I am yet to see an overwhelming majority of the relevant parties, i.e. those who do smallscale, say that guard is OP.Akalukz wrote:If guard isn't so strong, then why are some many people opposed to making changes to it.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Haskr and 4 guests