Koha wrote:go for a DOK it's a viable version of dps WP.
be aware that you'll never dare to try WP again...
Less cluncky abilites and tactics
10% natural parry
parry debuff -10%
best healdebuff
well the list is too long.
On his side the WP has a big hammer and late invader skin is awesome
hm...i think that WP is better than DOK in many points...its true that do less damage but is better for:
Heal debuff is a skill, you can put other tactic(25% okey but in party is not your fuction)
AOE detaunt is passive, you can put other tactic
10% parry buff=10% natural parry
10% armor penetration<10% parry debuff oki...(only better vs some classes only...)
skill damage is superrior=more self heal, why? 2h=dual?...real not...in highs levels 2h do more damage for...
wp->divine fury, fanaticism, grace of sigmar, hastened divinity (50% attack speed)
dok->divine fury,murderous intent,curse of khaine(healing debuff), 1 slot(without empowered transfer)...many options but sorry...you need aoe detaunt ofc, includes in solo roaming and 6vs6 is needed, if you want play without that...you have a problem, you need it in many situations
heal prot vs damage/heal prot....which is better?....depends
party 500hp buff vs skill to debuff 50 AP point
Really if you compare both i think that dok its not better, its different, and "for me" WP have more versatility build than DOK