Thanks for keeping me up to date, not seen already posted.
Seems i am to stupid to use the "Search" Command

Exuse me, but you are giving WPs AOE detaunt (that requires 8 points in the path of Wrath and tactic slot) just for free only because they are welding 2h hammer and even thinking - need DOK the same or not?Azarael wrote:- The Warrior Priest detaunt Repent will now work as if Intimidating Repent were slotted if the user is wielding a two-handed weapon.
This change is being made experimentally. If it is of use and Disciples of Khaine require it to be mirrored to them, we will do so. Currently only WP has been discussed on the forum, and we believe 2h WP to be weaker than dual wielding DoK.
Go read the balance discussion thread. Stop bitching. DoK wasn't modified because it wasn't tested yet to determine if it also needs modified.SilverWF wrote: Exuse me, but you are giving WPs AOE detaunt (that requires 8 points in the path of Wrath and tactic slot) just for free only because they are welding 2h hammer and even thinking - need DOK the same or not?
With perfect excuse - DOK wasn't discussed.
I'm crying![]()
Just reminder: in the Engi and Magus thread the discussion going mostly about Engineers.
Oh come on! No bitching!ThePollie wrote:Go read the balance discussion thread. Stop bitching. DoK wasn't modified because it wasn't tested yet to determine if it also needs modified.SilverWF wrote: Exuse me, but you are giving WPs AOE detaunt (that requires 8 points in the path of Wrath and tactic slot) just for free only because they are welding 2h hammer and even thinking - need DOK the same or not?
With perfect excuse - DOK wasn't discussed.
I'm crying![]()
Just reminder: in the Engi and Magus thread the discussion going mostly about Engineers.
Azarael wrote: [Experimental]
- The Warrior Priest detaunt Repent will now work as if Intimidating Repent were slotted if the user is wielding a two-handed weapon.
SilverWF wrote:Oh come on! No bitching!ThePollie wrote:Go read the balance discussion thread. Stop bitching. DoK wasn't modified because it wasn't tested yet to determine if it also needs modified.SilverWF wrote: Exuse me, but you are giving WPs AOE detaunt (that requires 8 points in the path of Wrath and tactic slot) just for free only because they are welding 2h hammer and even thinking - need DOK the same or not?
With perfect excuse - DOK wasn't discussed.
I'm crying![]()
Just reminder: in the Engi and Magus thread the discussion going mostly about Engineers.
Just a time to level up my WP - nothing else! I can't even expected such imba at live, thanks to local devs!
Wounds buff is all fun and games till you realize this exists:SilverWF wrote:Exuse me, but you are giving WPs AOE detaunt (that requires 8 points in the path of Wrath and tactic slot) just for free only because they are welding 2h hammer and even thinking - need DOK the same or not?Azarael wrote:- The Warrior Priest detaunt Repent will now work as if Intimidating Repent were slotted if the user is wielding a two-handed weapon.
This change is being made experimentally. If it is of use and Disciples of Khaine require it to be mirrored to them, we will do so. Currently only WP has been discussed on the forum, and we believe 2h WP to be weaker than dual wielding DoK.
And instead of waronlinebuilder.org - Warrior Priest build
they can go fully to Grace waronlinebuilder.org - Warrior Priest build
With perfect excuse - DOK wasn't discussed.
I'm crying![]()
Just reminder: in the Engi and Magus thread the discussion going mostly about Engineers.
He doesn't bother to read anything before posting a reply to anyone.peterthepan3 wrote: ...? Did you even bother to read any of the patchnotes prior to the implementation of this patch [...]
Hah, you were able to follow links in my sign and view thispeterthepan3 wrote:...? Did you even bother to read any of the patchnotes prior to the implementation of this patch, put forward by WP players - including Aza himself -that justified this change? Or is this yet another example of your blatant ignorance.
To suggest DPS WPs would become 'imba' with this change - a mandatory change, given how weak the class is in a melee environment - further suggests to me that you never played live, and just like to talk ****.
One moreLuth wrote:He doesn't bother to read anything before posting a reply to anyone.peterthepan3 wrote: ...? Did you even bother to read any of the patchnotes prior to the implementation of this patch [...]
Users browsing this forum: Hazmy and 1 guest