Recent Topics

Ads

Shadow Sting; The controversy

Chat about everything else - ask questions, share stories, or just hang out.
User avatar
Foxbeep
Posts: 123

Re: Shadow Sting; The controversy

Post#71 » Mon Dec 28, 2015 5:28 pm

If I must make an argument empirical for you I will, it'll just take a while.
In the meantime why don't you try to come up with some arguments other than your assumption that it will break T2.

Ads
bloodi
Suspended
Posts: 1725

Re: Shadow Sting; The controversy

Post#72 » Mon Dec 28, 2015 5:34 pm

Foxbeep wrote:If I must make an argument empirical for you I will, it'll just take a while.
In the meantime why don't you try to come up with some arguments other than your assumption that it will break T2.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosoph ... n_of_proof

User avatar
Foxbeep
Posts: 123

Re: Shadow Sting; The controversy

Post#73 » Mon Dec 28, 2015 5:40 pm

bloodi wrote:
Foxbeep wrote:If I must make an argument empirical for you I will, it'll just take a while.
In the meantime why don't you try to come up with some arguments other than your assumption that it will break T2.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosoph ... n_of_proof
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fallacies

Whoopdie doo I can do this too

Name one post on either side of the argument free of these.

bloodi
Suspended
Posts: 1725

Re: Shadow Sting; The controversy

Post#74 » Mon Dec 28, 2015 5:46 pm

Foxbeep wrote:Whoopdie doo I can do this too

Name one post on either side of the argument free of these.
I dont think you do seeing what you reply, read what i linked to you, we dont have to give you any arguments, the burden of proof is on you.

Until you come up with something other than "is not fair" or "it was like this on live" there is no more conversation or argument to be had.

Make an argument as to why Shadow sting should be move back down, then we can have an adult conversation as you claimeed you wanted to have, till now all you did was be a child about it and repeat the same bullshit again and again, all while somehow pretending that it was everyone else but you the ones with no argument.

User avatar
Foxbeep
Posts: 123

Re: Shadow Sting; The controversy

Post#75 » Mon Dec 28, 2015 6:32 pm

Well I gave it a bit of thought and the only arguments I can come up with lead back to my specific idea of fairness

Plus the devs already stated in the suggestions board they're not intending to move the ability

I cede.

User avatar
Toldavf
Posts: 1586

Re: Shadow Sting; The controversy

Post#76 » Mon Dec 28, 2015 7:13 pm

Fact is Inc heal debuffs are strong and what your asking for is allot. I don't think having your heal debuff 9 points high in the tree affects the quality of life of shadow warriors to badly you can still easily spec it if you like.

End of the day allot of classes cant get all the toys they want yet all you need is a little patience.
Khorlar, Thorvold, Sjohgar, Anareth, Toldavf, Hartwin, Gotrin and others -_-

Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], SmulMeister and 6 guests