RvR Siegs Review/Feedback
Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2020 1:16 pm
Hello everyone!
Forgive me for the English, I'm a little rusty
Guys, today I would like to pass on my feedback on how the rvr is after long years.
Just for the record, I've been playing Warhammer Online forever, live and here in RoR since Dev needed to log into my pc to create an acc and I test a server still crawling, where there was 10% of everything that works today, so congratulations to everyone involved in the project.
The RvR is without a doubt the icing on the cake, where everyone, at least almost everyone, meets for an intense war for castles, forts and then the attack on the cities. However, in fact, the RvR system lives in constant observation, and mine is that it is necessary to restructure the format between those who attack and those who defend. If there is not much success when both sides are almost numerically equal. Either the attack needs to be much greater or the defense much weaker in relation to level, equipment ...
Point 01
Dying near the keep takes you inside if the inside door is not under attack.
- Perhaps the correct thing would be that the defender who dies in the keep area does not return to the keep in any way, regardless of whether the inner door is under attack or not. What is the point of blocking the defenders from entering if they are going back inside anyway?
Point 02
AOE. The AOE of the game has definitely changed in the last few years, it is very strong, with absurd damage. In every type of invasion there is a corridor between the outside and inside giving privilege to those who do not need to expose themselves and just keep the floor warm. This added to point 01 turns into hell.
- I remember well that in live, although good, it was not the absurdity that is in RoR nowadays, how about a revision in this mechanics?
Have I considered giving the idea of creating a terror debuff when the inner door is open, very radical?
Anyway, I would like to see things happening not only at times when a faction is absent.
Thank you for your attention and I'm sorry if I ever expressed badly
Forgive me for the English, I'm a little rusty
Guys, today I would like to pass on my feedback on how the rvr is after long years.
Just for the record, I've been playing Warhammer Online forever, live and here in RoR since Dev needed to log into my pc to create an acc and I test a server still crawling, where there was 10% of everything that works today, so congratulations to everyone involved in the project.
The RvR is without a doubt the icing on the cake, where everyone, at least almost everyone, meets for an intense war for castles, forts and then the attack on the cities. However, in fact, the RvR system lives in constant observation, and mine is that it is necessary to restructure the format between those who attack and those who defend. If there is not much success when both sides are almost numerically equal. Either the attack needs to be much greater or the defense much weaker in relation to level, equipment ...
Point 01
Dying near the keep takes you inside if the inside door is not under attack.
- Perhaps the correct thing would be that the defender who dies in the keep area does not return to the keep in any way, regardless of whether the inner door is under attack or not. What is the point of blocking the defenders from entering if they are going back inside anyway?
Point 02
AOE. The AOE of the game has definitely changed in the last few years, it is very strong, with absurd damage. In every type of invasion there is a corridor between the outside and inside giving privilege to those who do not need to expose themselves and just keep the floor warm. This added to point 01 turns into hell.
- I remember well that in live, although good, it was not the absurdity that is in RoR nowadays, how about a revision in this mechanics?
Have I considered giving the idea of creating a terror debuff when the inner door is open, very radical?
Anyway, I would like to see things happening not only at times when a faction is absent.
Thank you for your attention and I'm sorry if I ever expressed badly