Page 1 of 1

Smurf Groups

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:01 pm
by Dackle
<removed>

Re: Smurf Groups

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:14 pm
by Eathisword
Probably not the case.

For one, it would be incredibly stupid... since a proper group would win by absolute annihilation 19/20 scenario anyway...

Re: Smurf Groups

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:19 pm
by Dackle
<removed>

Re: Smurf Groups

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:59 pm
by peterthepan3
Dackle wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:01 pm

Is the new meta to get in the same communication channel (Discord, ect.) and wipe your alt guild for the R's or paragons?

No.

Re: Smurf Groups

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 4:05 pm
by Martok
I found myself in one of those type sc's yesterday, where players who shall remain nameless, players who typically are very aggressive and playing to win, were basically standing around doing nothing or running in solo to get killed. I didn't understand it either.

Regardless of what may or may not be true, Dackle makes one valid point. Some of us have been playing long enough to be able to spot an abnormality.

Re: Smurf Groups

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 6:58 pm
by Dackle
<removed>

Re: Smurf Groups

Posted: Sat Aug 25, 2018 8:20 pm
by dansari
Dackle wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 6:58 pm
peterthepan3 wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:59 pm
Dackle wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:01 pm

Is the new meta to get in the same communication channel (Discord, ect.) and wipe your alt guild for the R's or paragons?

No.
Peter, I am not sure your role, however I have read many of your posts. You seem very sure of yourself on many issues. I am not saying one way or the other, but it may warrant being looked at. Does your definitive NO has some factual basis behind it or is that just your feeling?

No disrespect, your comments are public in the forums.
Peter speaks from a lot of 6v6 experience. I don't have much myself, comparatively, but tend to agree that what you're claiming to see is not what you assume it is.

Re: Smurf Groups

Posted: Sat May 11, 2019 7:21 pm
by Dackle
dansari wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 8:20 pm
Dackle wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 6:58 pm
peterthepan3 wrote: Sat Aug 25, 2018 2:59 pm

No.
Peter, I am not sure your role, however I have read many of your posts. You seem very sure of yourself on many issues. I am not saying one way or the other, but it may warrant being looked at. Does your definitive NO has some factual basis behind it or is that just your feeling?

No disrespect, your comments are public in the forums.
Peter speaks from a lot of 6v6 experience. I don't have much myself, comparatively, but tend to agree that what you're claiming to see is not what you assume it is.
Thanks for the clarification.

FYI, this exact scenario was discussed recently whilst lurking in a communication program I was invited to while running a dungeon instance. Randoms, discussing random things... (only the players were not so random)

PS - I like how the body of my messages were removed, but the replies still tell the story. More so, the story is transparent.