Page 1 of 3

priority

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 6:49 pm
by Antalor
Good evening.
I writing this topic to ask some kind of people, what is a point and how important is deleting old unical appearance in game. Probaly it's just waste of time. It's been long time since I saw a normal person here on forum which just want to talk with respectful mentality.("unical appearance" - e.g. Sorc's dress for DoK, Chosen's armor for Marauders, etc.). This kind of appearance items gained trought PvE weren't bugged.. We was able to get them for many years at official servers. Did it was bugged ? Would developers allow to wear bugged appearance items for few years ? But it's not WAR anymore.. We said goodbye to WAR on December 18th, 2013. Now we got RoR, which is just a mirror. As we got RoR now.. I ask you.. anyone who reading it now, where is sense to ruin next aspect of game.. PvE.. Even if this game is PvP/RvR focused game, we still got our good and buggy PvE. PvE is a choice when we have enough PvP/RvR. We could do some PvE for fun, because we knowed that we will be rewarded with great unical outfits.. Now it gone, so for what quests exist ? Delete it too with rest of unical appearance items which you missed.
Next question.. Well.. Seems like deleting unical appearance items is now a first priority. You won't fix hotspots.. You won't fix bugged party member's icons on map. When I created a topic about hotspots, nobody replied. Nobody care.
I remember old good times in WAR, when we all played for fun, there was some rages on chat, but there was also many players which was respectful and we was able to play with them with fun. I know it's gone. Now other things matter.
Seems like I wrote everything what I wanted to write. Now.. I'm able to get many rage message under this topic. I'm ready for that, because there's nothing left.
Greetings.
PS. I would say thank You to people from WAR and ROR which was a great men! I will always remember You guys.. this ones who leaved us and ones which I still play with. I say no regards to rest of You.

Re: priority

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 7:23 pm
by StormX2
ive read parts of this twice now and I just don't follow.

Are you complaining that we dont have enough PvE yet?

Priority was to get the game to a stable point where the main Aspect, PvP/RvR/Scenarios were, for hte most part, flawless.

Dungeons and such are coming, but it takes time.

Re: priority

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 7:27 pm
by Azarael
Let me preface this by saying I'm not responsible for the fixes.

This server has cross-realm appearance. If you are a WE, or a Sorc, or a DoK or any other class, you will visually identify as that class, using that class's gear, both for lore reasons and for gameplay ones.

Just another outcry in the same vein as "omg they removed the godawful ugly matte black dye! I can't look like an ugly snowflake any more!"

Get over it.
Next question.. Well.. Seems like deleting unical appearance items is now a first priority. You won't fix hotspots.. You won't fix bugged party member's icons on map. When I created a topic about hotspots, nobody replied. Nobody care.
READ THE SIGNATURE

You have no clue, no clue whatsoever as to what we are capable of fixing at the present time and why. I'd wager you know absolutely bloody nothing about the technical aspects of this project. In light of that, I suggest you keep your mouth shut rather than implying that we are ignoring serious bugs to fix your oh so beloved bugged appearance.

So ignorant.

Re: priority

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 7:37 pm
by zabis
#UglySnowflake

Re: priority

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 7:38 pm
by Luth
Image

Re: priority

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 7:49 pm
by Antalor
StormX2 wrote:ive read parts of this twice now and I just don't follow.

Are you complaining that we dont have enough PvE yet?

Priority was to get the game to a stable point where the main Aspect, PvP/RvR/Scenarios were, for hte most part, flawless.

Dungeons and such are coming, but it takes time.
Yes, this priority which you talked about is done. Now, please, read all of it, because you won't understand without it. I saying that now the priority focusing on deleting unical appearance equipment than fixing more important bugs.
Greetings.
PS. Thank you for normal comment.

Re: priority

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 7:57 pm
by Antalor
Azarael wrote:Let me preface this by saying I'm not responsible for the fixes.

This server has cross-realm appearance. If you are a WE, or a Sorc, or a DoK or any other class, you will visually identify as that class, using that class's gear, both for lore reasons and for gameplay ones.

Just another outcry in the same vein as "omg they removed the godawful ugly matte black dye! I can't look like an ugly snowflake any more!"

Get over it.
Next question.. Well.. Seems like deleting unical appearance items is now a first priority. You won't fix hotspots.. You won't fix bugged party member's icons on map. When I created a topic about hotspots, nobody replied. Nobody care.
READ THE SIGNATURE

You have no clue, no clue whatsoever as to what we are capable of fixing at the present time and why. I'd wager you know absolutely bloody nothing about the technical aspects of this project. In light of that, I suggest you keep your mouth shut rather than implying that we are ignoring serious bugs to fix your oh so beloved bugged appearance.

So ignorant.
Now.. Did I mentioned you ? I just shared my feelings about all this things what happening. I'm a free man as same as you and as same as everyone. I can to share my feelings and now I doing it.
No, I'm not crying. I don't know how long time did you spend with some kind of people but I'm not crying. If you won't understand that, you won't understand anything, all my topic. Okay, well.. "Someone" deleted actual unical appearance items, so why "someone" won't exchange it to another, good looking stuff ? I'm not crazy PvE lover which can't live without Sorc'a dress on my DOK.. I want to remind that this game works also on PvE. "Ignorant" ? Call me as you wish. I have rights to write my feelings and I used this rights when I made this topic.

Re: priority

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 7:59 pm
by Antalor
Luth wrote:Image
Well.. If you want to earn more numbers of posts on your profile.. Please, find another way.
EDIT: number*

Re: priority

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 8:00 pm
by bloodi
Well he is sharing his feelings towards you.

You are as free to write stupid things as people are of calling you stupid for writing them.

Re: priority

Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2016 8:05 pm
by wargrimnir
Antalor wrote:
StormX2 wrote:ive read parts of this twice now and I just don't follow.

Are you complaining that we dont have enough PvE yet?

Priority was to get the game to a stable point where the main Aspect, PvP/RvR/Scenarios were, for hte most part, flawless.

Dungeons and such are coming, but it takes time.
Yes, this priority which you talked about is done. Now, please, read all of it, because you won't understand without it. I saying that now the priority focusing on deleting unical appearance equipment than fixing more important bugs.
Greetings.
PS. Thank you for normal comment.
It hurts my brain that I need to explain this.

There are different bugs in the game. Some are easy to fix and can be handled by any of several staff members at their whim. Some bugs are extremely difficult to fix and are assigned to the most qualified. Some bugs cannot be fixed at all, either because we have no understanding of what causes them, or the most logical fix would require updating client side files, which we can't yet do.

We are not going to stop fixing low priority issues just because someone else may be working on a high priority issue. We have a wide variety of skill and talent which extend to different aspects of the game. Those who are able to, will continue fixing your appearance gear and creating new dye sets, or updating PvE quests and blocking off terrain exploits. This stuff is well understood.

You are not important. Your complaints are not important. Your notion that for some reason we're picking the lesser issues over the greater ones is terribly misled, and absolutely wrong. Ignorant is indeed the correct term here.