Page 1 of 1
Please explain how....
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 2:35 am
by Tenroc
On a previous thread of mine someone whined how order was over powered, specifically comparing WE vs. WH.
Looking at the two skill trees I am not seeing it. But I'm no expert player so can someone explain to me how WE is underpowered compared to its order mirror?
Re: Please explain how....
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 5:04 am
by bichka
>WE vs. WH
oh boi, this two is near to balanced. WE have better trees (100% disrupt ability in mandatory 3rd branch, while WH is in crappy 1st), WE have better tactics (except AA), WE m3 is offensive and more useful.
WH looks like finished class, not just AW spammer. Good finisher in branch with healdebuf and unique m4.
It's easier to manage AP with WE.
that's my point of view.
Re: Please explain how....
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 6:20 am
by Daknallbomb
One of the best words i have heard

:D:D:D
If they die its class imbalance and if they win its pure skill ;D love it soooo much
I would dont give a sh.... about ppl that whine cause of my class is not blanced etc .....
Re: Please explain how....
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 8:04 am
by bwdaWAR
Maybe some players feel the short and thin WE daggers inadequate compared to the length of the WH swords and the girth of the WH guns.
Re: Please explain how....
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 8:46 am
by arthur2k
In terms of talents and how the classes are played they are well balanced, in terms of mastery talent trees they are not.
For a WE to compare with a WH in solo raoming they are lackluster, WE shine in T3 not in T4 they are lackluster until RR50.
In term of group play they are good since middle tree is goodlike for that.
Other than that they are balanced

Re: Please explain how....
Posted: Sat May 14, 2016 9:05 am
by dirnsterer
I would say WH can be bit better off as solo when WE can excel better in the groups. That is the difference between the two and they are quite well balanced as such.