Because we are not here to recreate what WAR was. WAR was a miserable failure of a game, and it died for many good reasons. There's not a single aspect of the game that anyone could say, "I liked that," that they could not also point to and say, "...but they could have done it a lot better, and it's disappointing that they never tried too hard." It bled away players steadily every month for years, until it couldn't make enough money to cover the costs of renewing the IP. Nostalgia is a drug, and we're not here to fuel your addiction.Koha wrote:Why not keep the game as it was on live ? We all came back to play THIS game, not a new one...
We all missed this game so much, I don't see the point in changing it to deeply.
Moreover trying to balance things like that before testing the T4, is a bad start. Makes me fear the worst for the futur.
If the rules change too much it won't be the same game anymore.
Do you honestly think that we would spend years developing this project from scratch, paying for it out of our own pockets, listening to entitled whining every day, just to look at what we built and say, "Oh yeah, that's why I quit. Now I remember why it was shut down." Nah, we're here to make the game WAR could have been, had the developers listened to concerns and responded in time, or at all; had the developers been willing to make people angry for a few weeks, to improve the quality of the game for years.
If this is a question you actually have to ask, this might not be the place for you.Koha wrote:Why not keep the game as it was on live ?