Recent Topics

Ads

Melee/Assault SW

Discuss Swordmaster, Shadow Warrior, White Lion, and Archmage.
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.

Optional: Start your topic title with your class in brackets (e.g., [Shaman]). It helps others find your post faster.
AxelF
Posts: 225

Re: Melee/Assault SW

Post#81 » Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:45 pm

But but all you have to do is just change your entire gearing and you have a simple counter to this one tactic....

"Don't take my op toy away..."

Ads
User avatar
Anomanderake
Posts: 102

Re: Melee/Assault SW

Post#82 » Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:52 pm

Fact is, orders, for some reasons, have access to double debuff, that is broken anytime. Like for SM.
Do you want a shifting meta? Ok, give to destro some double debuff :P
Purake - BG 7X - GoD

For the Gaer Daecos' Freedoms

dansari
Posts: 2524

Re: Melee/Assault SW

Post#83 » Wed Feb 21, 2018 9:59 pm

forsa wrote:
rmpl wrote: Again, if a single tactic on a single character dictates the entire meta then there's something wrong with the balance.
Run Away
I think you spelled "auto detaunt" wrong. Hell I see a lot of squigs running it nowadays because it's better than any defensive gear you could ever slot.
<Salt Factory>

User avatar
rmpl
Posts: 766

Re: Melee/Assault SW

Post#84 » Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:00 pm

What are you even on about, no one runs SHs in 6v6s.

sogeou
Posts: 413

Re: Melee/Assault SW

Post#85 » Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:01 pm

Anomanderake wrote:Fact is, orders, for some reasons, have access to double debuff, that is broken anytime. Like for SM.
Do you want a shifting meta? Ok, give to destro some double debuff :P

There is no reason why Blorc and SH conq buff should not stack. That is 180 or whatever right there. So, that would get removed too.

User avatar
daniilpb
Posts: 591

Re: Melee/Assault SW

Post#86 » Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:03 pm

rmpl wrote:
Manatikik wrote:
rmpl wrote:That BO you're talking about is indeed running only 315 toughness which is more than enough for absolutely everything but wrist slash meme group.
I'm sorry, but when did running a viable build in a 6 man become a meme-group?

People just seem really salty that a meta is changing... Not the end of the world guys; adapt or do you want to platy the same builds/groups for 10 more years?
Again, if a single tactic on a single character dictates the entire meta then there's something wrong with the balance.
Wake up it's not the tactic! Tactic was always there and no one ever noticed it's existence. It wasn't even acceptable for a group to have a sw just for this tactic, it never gave any huge advantage. But Conq proc did that since everyone is whining now
Image
<Fusion>
Riphael - Black Guard.
Meridin - Sorcerer.
<FusionII>
Ripliel - Shadow Warrior.
Arfi - Swordmaster.
Very Serious Warhammer Online Montage

User avatar
Anomanderake
Posts: 102

Re: Melee/Assault SW

Post#87 » Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:07 pm

Even SM spirit debuff used to stack, no?
A lot of things changed here from live. You can’t ignore that fact. Maybe in a RR100 top gear environment such things don’t hurt.
Purake - BG 7X - GoD

For the Gaer Daecos' Freedoms

User avatar
Stinkyweed
Posts: 467

Re: Melee/Assault SW

Post#88 » Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:15 pm

rmpl wrote:What are you even on about, no one runs SHs in 6v6s.
/sadface

...No child wants to play with a Charlie-in-the-Box...
Stinkyweed SH - Prowl WE - Blob Chop - Babaganoush Sham - Fail CH - Negative Creep ZE - Brute BO - Motley Crue WH - Scratch WL

Don't fall asleep...don't fall asleep...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oP7uxesyQWo

Ads
User avatar
rmpl
Posts: 766

Re: Melee/Assault SW

Post#89 » Wed Feb 21, 2018 10:18 pm

daniilpb wrote:
rmpl wrote:
Manatikik wrote:
I'm sorry, but when did running a viable build in a 6 man become a meme-group?

People just seem really salty that a meta is changing... Not the end of the world guys; adapt or do you want to platy the same builds/groups for 10 more years?
Again, if a single tactic on a single character dictates the entire meta then there's something wrong with the balance.
Wake up it's not the tactic! Tactic was always there and no one ever noticed it's existence. It wasn't even acceptable for a group to have a sw just for this tactic, it never gave any huge advantage. But Conq proc did that since everyone is whining now
Not entirely, I'm against any stackable initiative debuff that's only available to one side be it conq proc or not.

dansari
Posts: 2524

Re: Melee/Assault SW

Post#90 » Wed Feb 21, 2018 11:00 pm

sogeou wrote:
Anomanderake wrote:Fact is, orders, for some reasons, have access to double debuff, that is broken anytime. Like for SM.
Do you want a shifting meta? Ok, give to destro some double debuff :P

There is no reason why Blorc and SH conq buff should not stack. That is 180 or whatever right there. So, that would get removed too.
Well, technically the reason is that they are both abilities.
<Salt Factory>

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dalael, Ninjagon and 1 guest