Page 9 of 10
Re: A few suggestions. Take 2 god damn time out!
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 12:49 am
by TenTonHammer
Vigfuss wrote:
Chain pouncing doesn't kill anything. A spammable root would be a huge gain for assist trains. I wouldn't complain about a nerf to pounce, but be careful what you call a nerf.
chain pouncing however can be used as to let pounce be used as an escape tool which tbt is not the role of the ability
Re: A few suggestions. Take 2 god damn time out!
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 12:58 am
by mursie
Vigfuss wrote:
Chain pouncing doesn't kill anything. A spammable root would be a huge gain for assist trains. I wouldn't complain about a nerf to pounce, but be careful what you call a nerf.
Chain pouncing would no longer occur - it would have a 10 second cooldown,.
Chain rooting would never occur - pounce would have a 10 second cooldown and grant an immovable immunity to target.
Re: A few suggestions. Take 2 god damn time out!
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:07 am
by vorod
can we at least wait until T4 is implemented as well as a host of other things, making changes to characters before this seems hasty.
Re: A few suggestions. Take 2 god damn time out!
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:18 am
by TenTonHammer
vorod wrote:can we at least wait until T4 is implemented as well as a host of other things, making changes to characters before this seems hasty.
We wait for t4
then people will say oh wait for full sov
the people will say oh wait for full renown
then something else like lotd pocket items
why wait for what could potentially be a year, or 2 or perhaps even more we its not we dont know for a large part how thing will turn out
mursie wrote:Vigfuss wrote:
Chain pouncing doesn't kill anything. A spammable root would be a huge gain for assist trains. I wouldn't complain about a nerf to pounce, but be careful what you call a nerf.
Chain pouncing would no longer occur - it would have a 10 second cooldown,.
Chain rooting would never occur - pounce would have a 10 second cooldown and grant an immovable immunity to target.
are wls also willing to give up there 100% kb immunity as well?
Re: A few suggestions. Take 2 god damn time out!
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:34 am
by Vigfuss
I think the idea behind the new balance forum is great. It will be really difficult to moderate, but at least it's an attempt to get a handle on all these suggested changes.
Can't these balance discussions wait until then?
Re: A few suggestions. Take 2 god damn time out!
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:47 am
by Gier
My sides go into orbit every time I see a destro ask for a pounce redesign, nerf, suggestion. As someone said, go play one and see how you fair they aren't that tough and die rather easily. The main reason we see WL's 'spamming pounce' is because how the server tracks player position. Pounce will never put you where the target is, but where the target was. This means that you are always out of range to apply damage and thus pounce again. Now lets say you pounce then charge, well a ranged snare is going to nullify the charge and we are back to square one. Moving on sure they have front loaded DPS but once it's gone its gone and you won't be getting a kill so please unless you play the class currently don't give us your hyperbole, go role one and see for yourself.
Now I'm going to leave and not really see how my post plays out because these forums are the most toxic I've ever had the shitty pleasure of being a part of.
Re: A few suggestions. Take 2 god damn time out!
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 1:52 am
by Genisaurus
Gier wrote:My sides go into orbit every time I see a destro ask for a pounce redesign, nerf, suggestion. As someone said, go play one and see how you fair they aren't that tough and die rather easily. The main reason we see WL's 'spamming pounce' is because how the server tracks player position. Pounce will never put you where the target is, but where the target was. This means that you are always out of range to apply damage and thus pounce again. Now lets say you pounce then charge, well a ranged snare is going to nullify the charge and we are back to square one. Moving on sure they have front loaded DPS but once it's gone its gone and you won't be getting a kill so please unless you play the class currently don't give us your hyperbole, go role one and see for yourself.
Now I'm going to leave and not really see how my post plays out because these forums are the most toxic I've ever had the shitty pleasure of being a part of.
"I didn't read the proposed change, but I think it's stupid to suggest any change because of a problem that I don't know that the suggested change would address because I didn't read it. Now I'm going to ignore you telling me I'm full of **** because every time I demonstrate that I'm full of ****, someone calls me out on it."
Okay.
Re: A few suggestions. Take 2 god damn time out!
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:49 am
by Joshwa70
Proposed change of pounce. It goes back to the original 55 ap it ysed to cost. And is an aoe agaiin. It also now does spirit damage and incurs a 3 sec snare to primary target.
In fact... we could just fix leonine frenzy and ppl might play the wl another way.
Re: A few suggestions. Take 2 god damn time out!
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:02 am
by Razid1987
TenTonHammer wrote:
We wait for t4
then people will say oh wait for full sov
the people will say oh wait for full renown
then something else like lotd pocket items
why wait for what could potentially be a year, or 2 or perhaps even more we its not we dont know for a large part how thing will turn out
I get what you are saying, but I think at least waiting for T4 for big changes, is a smart move. By T4 at least everyone will have all their base tactics, morales, and abilities. Yes, they will get more Mastery points at higher RR, sure. But I honestly don't see that as enough justification for waiting with making changes at that point.
Of course, there's gonna be people wanting that. That's pretty much a given. The question is, if they can give a good reason for waiting even longer.
Re: A few suggestions. Take 2 god damn time out!
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:06 am
by Razid1987
Genisaurus wrote:
"I didn't read the proposed change, but I think it's stupid to suggest any change because of a problem that I don't know that the suggested change would address because I didn't read it. Now I'm going to ignore you telling me I'm full of **** because every time I demonstrate that I'm full of ****, someone calls me out on it."
Okay.
LOL
Rekt
