Re: Order's overpowered classes.
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2018 6:03 pm
AM the new honeybadger
Warhammer Online
https://returnofreckoning.com/forum/
danny262 wrote: Mon Sep 17, 2018 10:44 amPlease pick three, so we can have a more accurate result per vote.
How is the community of players supose to find empirical proof of anyting happening in game? You undersstand that empiri means you collect alot of data and have experts analyzing all the data to come with a conclusion or outcome. Gathering data from people's lived experiences and opinions is usually how it's made. Screenshots, scoreboards etz are perfectly fine aslong as you have enought of em. Dismissing people's opinions as noncense is just stupid as you won't get acurate form of evidence. Picking the facts you like due to it comming from the "right people" and dismissing other's opinions you don't like is cherry picking facts.peterthepan3 wrote: Mon Sep 17, 2018 3:55 pmCheers.Sanao wrote: Mon Sep 17, 2018 3:48 pmhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populumdanny262 wrote: Mon Sep 17, 2018 3:32 pm
Everyone consider different classes overwhelming at a different scale (0-1) (this is personal opinion factor) ideally we want to have a balanced distribution.
If we find a radical, we know most players(voters) think it's overpowered in many ways above where it should be,
According to the poll results so far we learn that AM is far overpowered compared to Runepriest while both classified as Healers. (Over 50+ people agrees on it atm)
This poll is first to come, it reflects the radical classes that considered overpowered by the vast majority of voters so don't be negative and get your friends to vote.
Best of luck with your poll.
You are attempting to elicit opinions and equate them to solid proof of class x overperforming. Most opinions stemming from sentimental/solo experience, no doubt.
Again - no bearing whatsoever on how balance will be conducted. Find us empirical proof of classes overperforming in group and/or warband environments, and Dan and I are all ears.
ps. empirical proof not being scenario scoreboards with 0 healers on opposing side.
It's not hard. If there are 1 out of 2 scoreboard or combat logs showing something then there's really no conclusion that can be drawn. If you have 1000 out of 2000 showing some sort of continuity then they are probobly on to something.Sulorie wrote: Mon Sep 17, 2018 6:35 pm Most people fail to read combat log and sc results correctly, how you want to use this as proof?
Give AM stances like last patches did to WL and they would be truly invincible. I would even start one then.Amidala wrote: Mon Sep 17, 2018 5:55 pm Am dps must be deleted ofc. They do what thwy want. Like they travel in open rvr and they put dots on left and dots on right side. They have shitty def, spells can be interrupted, but no one can catch them and kick their faces in melee. They got invisible tactic in last patch!!! 1111.
How would you suggest making a game fairly enjoyable for everyone?Sulorie wrote: Mon Sep 17, 2018 6:35 pm Most people fail to read combat log and sc results correctly, how you want to use this as proof?
You don't balance based on feelings.danny262 wrote: Mon Sep 17, 2018 8:56 pm
We need around 1,500 votes of say 500 dedicated-players to contribute their opinion (all of them!) so we can confidently agree that the vast majority of players, feels that way.