Lets try to avoid generic stats debuff/buff ideas as theyre usually covered by Natures Blade.
I'm still leaning more towards the personal Crit DAMAGE increase similar to Blorcs passive crit damage increase tactic, but in personal proc form.
Heaven's Blade
Re: Heaven's Blade
Last edited by Osred on Wed Dec 20, 2017 4:00 pm, edited 4 times in total.
Osri - 40/79 - Runepriest
Osarion 40/82 - Swordmaster
Osgrim 40/74 - Ironbreaker
Osarion 40/82 - Swordmaster
Osgrim 40/74 - Ironbreaker
Ads
Re: Heaven's Blade
Could you clarify?Penril wrote:Not really. Look at past WH/WE proposals.dansari wrote: with this change we really need to consider how to make SM more viable for warband play.
<Salt Factory>
Re: Heaven's Blade
The Swordmaster is plenty fine in Warbands, even without HB. Are their more optimal classes for specific roles? Sure. Swordmaster is the most damaging tank on Order side. That's a trade-off for being a bit less tanky. You can't make them tankier without lowering their damage output, or they'd be too strong.
They still have everything that makes a Tank in WBs. Hold the Line, Guard, and CC which is 98% of your job as a tank. Put away the 2H and pick up a shield, and they perform the same role as the other tanks, just take slightly more damage.
Edit: I had to look up if Swordmasters could even use Shields, because I've literally never seen a single one without a 2H.
But we're getting off-topic.
They still have everything that makes a Tank in WBs. Hold the Line, Guard, and CC which is 98% of your job as a tank. Put away the 2H and pick up a shield, and they perform the same role as the other tanks, just take slightly more damage.
Edit: I had to look up if Swordmasters could even use Shields, because I've literally never seen a single one without a 2H.
But we're getting off-topic.
Last edited by Axerker on Wed Dec 20, 2017 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- GodlessCrom
- Suspended
- Posts: 1297
Re: Heaven's Blade
100% certain it is a "not all classes are viable in all situations" deal.dansari wrote:Could you clarify?Penril wrote:Not really. Look at past WH/WE proposals.dansari wrote: with this change we really need to consider how to make SM more viable for warband play.
I for one welcome the return of IB/slayer meta from live

Rush in and die, dogs - I was a man before I was a king!
Re: Heaven's Blade
I don't want to derail. So just look for past WE/WH proposals and read why they were declined (namely, the ones that asked for buffs to be more useful in warbands.
- peterthepan3
- Posts: 6509
Re: Heaven's Blade
Spoiler:
Since I don't want to lock this thread (yet) I will just moderate posts like this one from now on.

Re: Heaven's Blade
Spoiler:
Re: Heaven's Blade
Yes, got it now.Penril wrote:I don't want to derail. So just look for past WE/WH proposals and read why they were declined (namely, the ones that asked for buffs to be more useful in warbands.
That makes sense, and honestly this is what it will become.GodlessCrom wrote:100% certain it is a "not all classes are viable in all situations" deal.dansari wrote:Could you clarify?Penril wrote:
Not really. Look at past WH/WE proposals.
I for one welcome the return of IB/slayer meta from live
<Salt Factory>
Ads
Re: Heaven's Blade
Spoiler:

<Salt Factory>
- live4treasure
- Posts: 325
Re: Heaven's Blade
What if it procs an effect similar to Skull Thumpa I think it was called, an ability that causes every attack on the target for the next x seconds to deal x additional spirit damage?
Giladar - rr 82 DPS AM
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest