Re: (Mythic) origins of balance
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 7:10 pm
RP/WP works better for us.roadkillrobin wrote:lol BB, still thinkin in terms of a ST hero.
Ok lets put it the other way round, good luck for your 2 WP's to cleanse Bad Gas.
Warhammer Online
https://returnofreckoning.com/forum/
RP/WP works better for us.roadkillrobin wrote:lol BB, still thinkin in terms of a ST hero.
Ok lets put it the other way round, good luck for your 2 WP's to cleanse Bad Gas.
You could say this was an inbalanced fight.roadkillrobin wrote:Could say this is a horrible ballanced group.
But it worked.
6 Goblins
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lko7QD_a-Io
Yes thats true, but thats rarly the case tho.Penril wrote:RP/WP works better for us.roadkillrobin wrote:lol BB, still thinkin in terms of a ST hero.
Ok lets put it the other way round, good luck for your 2 WP's to cleanse Bad Gas.
Actually, i think most of those comments are not unconstructive at all. There are some really bad suggestions in this thread and if no one points them out, some new/inexperienced players might think "hey this is the way I should play".roadkillrobin wrote:Same 3-4 people jumpin into every single thread spreading their negative unconstructive comments.
Organised warbands bomb because it's the best method in ORvR. It's just how the game is balanced, and the nature of having an environment with +15 targets. AoE will always be favorable with +15 targets, unless single-target damage is extremely overpowered.Nameless wrote:why ppl think warbands only need to bomb? Warband being with single target focus /eventaully dual ST/ could work just great only problem is that such thing requare high skilled player and great communication and leading. And such wb being greenskins could do quite well even vs min-maxers
We're just theory crafting, i don't think you posted anything unconstructive. You atleat explains how you reason. But for the other people who just come in almoast evry single thread and pukes out/trolls are just so unnesesary. The truth is the few times i see those guys in the game they get outpeformed by players who are much worse geared and lower lvl then they are. So my guess is that they need to compensate for that by goin into the forums and do what they do.Penril wrote:Actually, i think most of those comments are not unconstructive at all. There are some really bad suggestions in this thread and if no one points them out, some new/inexperienced players might think "hey this is the way I should play".roadkillrobin wrote:Same 3-4 people jumpin into every single thread spreading their negative unconstructive comments.
Now, are some of those 3-4 people rude in the way they post? Yes. Agreed on that one.
Yes you can play like that aswell. but it's better to run 4 sepreate 6man groups for this, Since you need to spread out the assisting between the groups. Wich means you all need to be in different coms. If you all assist on the same targets you're just killing 1 target at the time and that will get your entire wb killed. This has been tried multiple times tho and the Bomb wb probobly had something like 90% sucess against the ST assisting one.Nameless wrote:why ppl think warbands only need to bomb? Warband being with single target focus /eventaully dual ST/ could work just great only problem is that such thing requare high skilled player and great communication and leading. And such wb being greenskins could do quite well even vs min-maxers