Recent Topics

Ads

(Mythic) origins of balance

Chat about everything else - ask questions, share stories, or just hang out.
Penril
Posts: 4441

Re: (Mythic) origins of balance

Post#71 » Wed Mar 02, 2016 7:10 pm

roadkillrobin wrote:lol BB, still thinkin in terms of a ST hero.
Ok lets put it the other way round, good luck for your 2 WP's to cleanse Bad Gas.
RP/WP works better for us.

Ads
bloodi
Suspended
Posts: 1725

Re: (Mythic) origins of balance

Post#72 » Wed Mar 02, 2016 7:12 pm

roadkillrobin wrote:Could say this is a horrible ballanced group.
But it worked.
6 Goblins
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lko7QD_a-Io
You could say this was an inbalanced fight.

But it worked.

1 cat
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=je_9QhJFSR0

User avatar
roadkillrobin
Posts: 2773

Re: (Mythic) origins of balance

Post#73 » Wed Mar 02, 2016 7:17 pm

Penril wrote:
roadkillrobin wrote:lol BB, still thinkin in terms of a ST hero.
Ok lets put it the other way round, good luck for your 2 WP's to cleanse Bad Gas.
RP/WP works better for us.
Yes thats true, but thats rarly the case tho.
Image

User avatar
TenTonHammer
Posts: 3806

Re: (Mythic) origins of balance

Post#74 » Wed Mar 02, 2016 7:59 pm

congratulations you 6 man grp trolled some pugs
Image

User avatar
roadkillrobin
Posts: 2773

Re: (Mythic) origins of balance

Post#75 » Wed Mar 02, 2016 8:19 pm

Same 3-4 people jumpin into every single thread spreading their negative unconstructive comments.
Image

Penril
Posts: 4441

Re: (Mythic) origins of balance

Post#76 » Wed Mar 02, 2016 8:24 pm

roadkillrobin wrote:Same 3-4 people jumpin into every single thread spreading their negative unconstructive comments.
Actually, i think most of those comments are not unconstructive at all. There are some really bad suggestions in this thread and if no one points them out, some new/inexperienced players might think "hey this is the way I should play".

Now, are some of those 3-4 people rude in the way they post? Yes. Agreed on that one.

User avatar
Nameless
Posts: 1397

Re: (Mythic) origins of balance

Post#77 » Wed Mar 02, 2016 8:33 pm

why ppl think warbands only need to bomb? Warband being with single target focus /eventaully dual ST/ could work just great only problem is that such thing requare high skilled player and great communication and leading. And such wb being greenskins could do quite well even vs min-maxers
Mostly harmless

K8P & Norn - guild Orz

User avatar
Razid1987
Posts: 1295

Re: (Mythic) origins of balance

Post#78 » Wed Mar 02, 2016 8:48 pm

Nameless wrote:why ppl think warbands only need to bomb? Warband being with single target focus /eventaully dual ST/ could work just great only problem is that such thing requare high skilled player and great communication and leading. And such wb being greenskins could do quite well even vs min-maxers
Organised warbands bomb because it's the best method in ORvR. It's just how the game is balanced, and the nature of having an environment with +15 targets. AoE will always be favorable with +15 targets, unless single-target damage is extremely overpowered.

I also like how you imply that bombing doesn't require skill, communication, nor leadership, to be successful. This is simply false.

Ads
User avatar
Nameless
Posts: 1397

Re: (Mythic) origins of balance

Post#79 » Wed Mar 02, 2016 9:00 pm

ppl here speak about 6v6, 12v12 and wb vs wb. When facing more enemies than your own numbers bombing is good way to go. But for equal numbers /even wb v wb/ ST is quite superior. So for the sake of the argument ST wb would win vs AOE wb everyday. And from that perspective ST greenskins wb would be pretty competative since they get great tools to be
Last edited by Nameless on Wed Mar 02, 2016 9:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mostly harmless

K8P & Norn - guild Orz

User avatar
roadkillrobin
Posts: 2773

Re: (Mythic) origins of balance

Post#80 » Wed Mar 02, 2016 9:01 pm

Penril wrote:
roadkillrobin wrote:Same 3-4 people jumpin into every single thread spreading their negative unconstructive comments.
Actually, i think most of those comments are not unconstructive at all. There are some really bad suggestions in this thread and if no one points them out, some new/inexperienced players might think "hey this is the way I should play".

Now, are some of those 3-4 people rude in the way they post? Yes. Agreed on that one.
We're just theory crafting, i don't think you posted anything unconstructive. You atleat explains how you reason. But for the other people who just come in almoast evry single thread and pukes out/trolls are just so unnesesary. The truth is the few times i see those guys in the game they get outpeformed by players who are much worse geared and lower lvl then they are. So my guess is that they need to compensate for that by goin into the forums and do what they do.
Nameless wrote:why ppl think warbands only need to bomb? Warband being with single target focus /eventaully dual ST/ could work just great only problem is that such thing requare high skilled player and great communication and leading. And such wb being greenskins could do quite well even vs min-maxers
Yes you can play like that aswell. but it's better to run 4 sepreate 6man groups for this, Since you need to spread out the assisting between the groups. Wich means you all need to be in different coms. If you all assist on the same targets you're just killing 1 target at the time and that will get your entire wb killed. This has been tried multiple times tho and the Bomb wb probobly had something like 90% sucess against the ST assisting one.
Image

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: margni and 20 guests