Page 8 of 10
Re: Balance Section
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:04 pm
by Scrilian
Poll did nothing to bring the "original" WE class icon back :C
Re: Balance Section
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:09 pm
by Penril
Scrilian wrote:Ah, my bad, I misread his previous
post. "is =/= is't"

But never the less hope to see less of that generalisation.
It was just an example, but i agree. My bad.
Re: Balance Section
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:14 pm
by WhatPenrilThinks
noisestorm wrote:Remember, just because some people here got a blue name, does not mean they cannot state their own opinions on anything anymore. Especially outside of the balance forum were still normal players. Were just here to see that exactly above mentioned stuff will not happen in the new section - thats it. And while we try to ensure a good readable forum , I personally also expect people to do so and do not even dare to complain afterwards.
PS: lolpenriluarebad get gud scrublord :>
Why do you attack Penril?
Re: Balance Section
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:40 pm
by Bretin
WhatPenrilThinks wrote:noisestorm wrote:Remember, just because some people here got a blue name, does not mean they cannot state their own opinions on anything anymore. Especially outside of the balance forum were still normal players. Were just here to see that exactly above mentioned stuff will not happen in the new section - thats it. And while we try to ensure a good readable forum , I personally also expect people to do so and do not even dare to complain afterwards.
PS: lolpenriluarebad get gud scrublord :>
Why do you attack Penril?
Why do you copy Wingz?
Re: Balance Section
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:42 pm
by Penril
I thought he was definitely not Wingz... is he?
That other guy is not me.
Re: Balance Section
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:42 pm
by noisestorm
But its definitely not wingz?! i am confused
Re: Balance Section
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:44 pm
by DefinitelyNotWingz
I am not Wingz, definitely.
But I feel offended by this cheap copy of my avatar.
Guess some people lack humour and try to be funny. Not that I am surprised.
Re: Balance Section
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 2:51 pm
by Penril
DefinitelyNotWingz, those glasses look way better on you anyway. You can discuss your Avatars in another thread though

Re: Balance Section
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 3:24 pm
by Vigfuss
Penril wrote:Yet when those changes make it to the game and a Patch Notes thread comes up, a few people suddenly appear out of nowhere and are against it. Most of these people never even bothered posting (or possibly reading) in the original threads.
Anyway, as i said: this is just my opinion.
Thanks for stepping up to do this Penril!
As for appearing out of nowhere, I know I've been accused of doing that (not by you). I read quite a lot of what gets posted here, but I don't read everything. If I replied to every post I didn't agree with I'd be here all day just typing. I usually try to add my opinion if a thread seems to be going somewhere, and not every time someone say's nerf this or buff that. Lately a lot of threads seem like they could be going somewhere, because Devs and Mods are posting their opinions everywhere, and I can't keep up with it all.
A better signal to noise ratio will be a huge improvement for people like me.

I think that will help people who aren't on the forums much, language barrier etc.
Re: Balance Section
Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 3:35 pm
by TenTonHammer
The problem that had been with the AM/SH cast move change was that the discussion had not been centralized in the sense that it was quite a few pages into a thread that was on i believe a completely different thread topic that derailed to a tangential discussion topic?
I mean i browse and lurk on the forums a lot but i cant be expected to read through every thread
thankfully the balance forums address this