Page 8 of 14

Re: Changelog 07/01

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 8:51 pm
by deadtime
oh, sorry.

Thanks for keeping me up to date, not seen already posted.
Seems i am to stupid to use the "Search" Command ;-)

Re: Changelog 07/01

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 9:20 pm
by SilverWF
Azarael wrote:- The Warrior Priest detaunt Repent will now work as if Intimidating Repent were slotted if the user is wielding a two-handed weapon.

This change is being made experimentally. If it is of use and Disciples of Khaine require it to be mirrored to them, we will do so. Currently only WP has been discussed on the forum, and we believe 2h WP to be weaker than dual wielding DoK.
Exuse me, but you are giving WPs AOE detaunt (that requires 8 points in the path of Wrath and tactic slot) just for free only because they are welding 2h hammer and even thinking - need DOK the same or not?
And instead of waronlinebuilder.org - Warrior Priest build
they can go fully to Grace waronlinebuilder.org - Warrior Priest build
With perfect excuse - DOK wasn't discussed.
I'm crying :D

Just reminder: in the Engi and Magus thread the discussion going mostly about Engineers.

Re: Changelog 07/01

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 9:25 pm
by ThePollie
SilverWF wrote: Exuse me, but you are giving WPs AOE detaunt (that requires 8 points in the path of Wrath and tactic slot) just for free only because they are welding 2h hammer and even thinking - need DOK the same or not?
With perfect excuse - DOK wasn't discussed.
I'm crying :D

Just reminder: in the Engi and Magus thread the discussion going mostly about Engineers.
Go read the balance discussion thread. Stop bitching. DoK wasn't modified because it wasn't tested yet to determine if it also needs modified.

Re: Changelog 07/01

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 9:30 pm
by SilverWF
ThePollie wrote:
SilverWF wrote: Exuse me, but you are giving WPs AOE detaunt (that requires 8 points in the path of Wrath and tactic slot) just for free only because they are welding 2h hammer and even thinking - need DOK the same or not?
With perfect excuse - DOK wasn't discussed.
I'm crying :D

Just reminder: in the Engi and Magus thread the discussion going mostly about Engineers.
Go read the balance discussion thread. Stop bitching. DoK wasn't modified because it wasn't tested yet to determine if it also needs modified.
Oh come on! No bitching!
Just a time to level up my WP - nothing else! I can't even expected such imba at live, thanks to local devs! :D

Re: Changelog 07/01

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 9:32 pm
by Londo
Azarael wrote: [Experimental]

- The Warrior Priest detaunt Repent will now work as if Intimidating Repent were slotted if the user is wielding a two-handed weapon.
Image

Re: Changelog 07/01

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 9:39 pm
by Renork
I don't see anything wrong with the experimental change. Unlike the magus/eng discussion thread, melee healers have always been shitty in every tier. Good for wp's :>

Re: Changelog 07/01

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 9:39 pm
by peterthepan3
SilverWF wrote:
ThePollie wrote:
SilverWF wrote: Exuse me, but you are giving WPs AOE detaunt (that requires 8 points in the path of Wrath and tactic slot) just for free only because they are welding 2h hammer and even thinking - need DOK the same or not?
With perfect excuse - DOK wasn't discussed.
I'm crying :D

Just reminder: in the Engi and Magus thread the discussion going mostly about Engineers.
Go read the balance discussion thread. Stop bitching. DoK wasn't modified because it wasn't tested yet to determine if it also needs modified.
Oh come on! No bitching!
Just a time to level up my WP - nothing else! I can't even expected such imba at live, thanks to local devs! :D


...? Did you even bother to read any of the patchnotes prior to the implementation of this patch, put forward by WP players - including Aza himself -that justified this change? Or is this yet another example of your blatant ignorance.
To suggest DPS WPs would become 'imba' with this change - a mandatory change, given how weak the class is in a melee environment - further suggests to me that you never played live, and just like to talk ****.

Re: Changelog 07/01

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 9:40 pm
by rmpl
SilverWF wrote:
Azarael wrote:- The Warrior Priest detaunt Repent will now work as if Intimidating Repent were slotted if the user is wielding a two-handed weapon.

This change is being made experimentally. If it is of use and Disciples of Khaine require it to be mirrored to them, we will do so. Currently only WP has been discussed on the forum, and we believe 2h WP to be weaker than dual wielding DoK.
Exuse me, but you are giving WPs AOE detaunt (that requires 8 points in the path of Wrath and tactic slot) just for free only because they are welding 2h hammer and even thinking - need DOK the same or not?
And instead of waronlinebuilder.org - Warrior Priest build
they can go fully to Grace waronlinebuilder.org - Warrior Priest build
With perfect excuse - DOK wasn't discussed.
I'm crying :D

Just reminder: in the Engi and Magus thread the discussion going mostly about Engineers.
Wounds buff is all fun and games till you realize this exists:
Image

Re: Changelog 07/01

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 9:42 pm
by Luth
peterthepan3 wrote: ...? Did you even bother to read any of the patchnotes prior to the implementation of this patch [...]
He doesn't bother to read anything before posting a reply to anyone.

Re: Changelog 07/01

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2016 9:44 pm
by SilverWF
peterthepan3 wrote:...? Did you even bother to read any of the patchnotes prior to the implementation of this patch, put forward by WP players - including Aza himself -that justified this change? Or is this yet another example of your blatant ignorance.
To suggest DPS WPs would become 'imba' with this change - a mandatory change, given how weak the class is in a melee environment - further suggests to me that you never played live, and just like to talk ****.
Hah, you were able to follow links in my sign and view this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_UFIZ-k2Q0
but prefered to post that text, sadly :(

I hope, you are familiar with WP skill icons, if not - use warbuilder :D
Luth wrote:
peterthepan3 wrote: ...? Did you even bother to read any of the patchnotes prior to the implementation of this patch [...]
He doesn't bother to read anything before posting a reply to anyone.
One more
:D :D