Re: Triumphant Jewelry - A request to reconsider the cost
Posted: Tue Nov 29, 2022 2:16 am
I just got mine it took some time but I think its ok.
Warhammer Online
https://returnofreckoning.com/forum/
Why should it be changed to RR80 ?Avernus wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 10:55 am Basically, everyone who already bought this says that it's ok just farm like i did. The ones who didn't bought this yet (me too), obviously, gonna say that this price is inadequate.
To the ones who are saying that this is endgame gear - stop this nonsence pls. Endgame gear it's sovereign. And you must have max RR to wear full set even if you have it in your pocket.
Can't say the same about this set though. Does it requare you to be around 80 RR? No.
You can buy other set pieces for a reasonable price - but not the bloody trinket because you can't buy the last piece of this set (which isn't even top set at the moment) because of this so called "price" (and we should be thankful that there is no need to farm this dead ranking? yeah sure...)
Just think about it - you farm for your sovereign (actual top gear, you must be around 80 to wear it) and then you gonna farm for some lower lvl set (reasonable price for armor parts) to mix it up and get the trinket which DOES NOT actually require you to be around 80 RR (TOP right? right?!) but costs like your full top set? Really?!
Make this set for 80RR and i won't say anything about this price.
Because the only more or less acceptable reason for this price to exist is to have it on endgame gear. 80 RR is good for endgame gear. As it is now - it's overcosted nonsense.lemao wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:21 am Why should it be changed to RR80 ?
By the time you farm your 10 k crests for the ring you will be rr 80 + automatically anyways, probably even rr 83 +...It literally doesnt matter if you change the requirement to wear the ring to rr 80.
So you think that it's "overcosted nonsense", but if the requirement was rr80 with no stat changes it would suddenly not be anymore? Rank requirements don't really mean much, you can wear full bloodlord at rank 40 no matter the RR or should we make the bloodlord weapon rr80 as it's bis for most dps?Avernus wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:37 amBecause the only more or less acceptable reason for this price to exist is to have it on endgame gear. 80 RR is good for endgame gear. As it is now - it's overcosted nonsense.lemao wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:21 am Why should it be changed to RR80 ?
By the time you farm your 10 k crests for the ring you will be rr 80 + automatically anyways, probably even rr 83 +...It literally doesnt matter if you change the requirement to wear the ring to rr 80.
It's not endgame stat wise, it gives (by itself) much less than sov jewels. Its cost comes from the fact that its one of two gear pieces you can slot special talismans on, and those are not tied to renown. Just like sentinel ring has no price by itself, as a matter of fact, and used to be much harder to obtain. Those are two most unique gear pieces in game, and you can't compare their price to anything else. And that's without considering the whole ranked part.Avernus wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:37 amBecause the only more or less acceptable reason for this price to exist is to have it on endgame gear. 80 RR is good for endgame gear. As it is now - it's overcosted nonsense.lemao wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 11:21 am Why should it be changed to RR80 ?
By the time you farm your 10 k crests for the ring you will be rr 80 + automatically anyways, probably even rr 83 +...It literally doesnt matter if you change the requirement to wear the ring to rr 80.
1. Yes.Cyrylius wrote: Tue Nov 29, 2022 3:55 pm 1. It's not endgame stat wise, it gives (by itself) much less than sov jewels.
2. Its cost comes from the fact that its one of two gear pieces you can slot special talismans on, and those are not tied to renown. Just like sentinel ring has no price by itself, as a matter of fact, and used to be much harder to obtain.
3. Those are two most unique gear pieces in game, and you can't compare their price to anything else.
4. And that's without considering the whole ranked part.