Post#63 » Fri Nov 06, 2020 5:53 pm
I think that this is a good explanation for something that was obviously a mistake. You don't really need substantial testing to look at an inifinite up-time proc on hit being that strong in any ORvR setting to know that it was overtuned.
To all the destro that are still defending the original change as "not that good, leave it as it was," just .... lol, did u even read the OP here?
In regards to vigilance, I would say that the tactic was meant to not require a shield. Why in the world would a damage reduction be included for SnB tanks? Not really a punishment to have your 100 dmg hits cut to 50 dmg. Yes the icon is a shield but it is also just the same icon as guard, which suggests that guard should then require a shield (oh wait we tried that). My money is on icons being reused by cheapskate EA but thats just one man's opinion.
Chosen's needing to have crit for mid tree does seem backwards. Runefang/DC in right tree needing parry makes more sense since every tank ever stacks parry.
Last edited by
CountTalabecland on Fri Nov 06, 2020 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Brynnoth Goldenbeard (40/80) (IB) -- Rundin Fireheart (40/50) (RP) -- Ungrinn (40/40) (Engi)-- Bramm Bloodaxe (40/83) (Slayer) and a few Empire characters here or there, maybe even an elf.