Page 6 of 9

Re: RSH Underperforming

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2020 3:38 am
by Jabba
Hardkoar wrote: Wed Oct 28, 2020 10:31 pm
Jabba wrote: Wed Oct 28, 2020 10:34 am Still don't understand why people are talking about rSH not being wanted in warbands as a reason for changing them. If you want to play in warbands on a sh, you don't play rSH.

If you want to play in warbands on zeal/shaman/dok/rp/wp/am....you don't play dps, you play heal.

If you want to play warbands on a tank, you don't play as a loldps spec, you play as snb or select 2h utility specs.

If you want to play in a warband on choppa/slayer, you don't play 2h spec, you play dual wield with the appropriate spec.

If you want to play as an engi/magus, you don't play as a single target/toughness roam spec. You spec appropiately.

WL you don't play with pet spec. You play loner.

Mara, you don't play a savagery/brutality build. You spec Monstro.

etc etc


All classes have specs that are not viable for warbands, if you want to play in proper warbands on these classes, maybe you don't get to play your preferred spec. For SH, this means you play mSH, rather than range.
I find it interesting how you compare a TANK Dps to a Squig herder, a RANGED DPS CLASS , telling them ''don't play the lolspec'' go melee...
You have totally understood the point of this entire post.
Because rSH isn't meant to be an aoe class, their range spec excels in other formats of the game. As shocking as this might be for some people to learn, there are in fact other facets to the game than mindless zerging,
aoe spamming and funnels. If you want to do those, Sh already has a spec that is suited to it.

The point clearly being that you should play the appropriate spec for whatever content you're doing if you want to do well in that content. You're all talking as though SH doesn't have an appropriate spec for aoe already, when it does. It's as simple as that. SW had no viable aoe build in any of spec. They were given one.

Re: RSH Underperforming

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:54 am
by ceramicartist
Jabba wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2020 3:38 am
Hardkoar wrote: Wed Oct 28, 2020 10:31 pm
Jabba wrote: Wed Oct 28, 2020 10:34 am Still don't understand why people are talking about rSH not being wanted in warbands as a reason for changing them. If you want to play in warbands on a sh, you don't play rSH.

If you want to play in warbands on zeal/shaman/dok/rp/wp/am....you don't play dps, you play heal.

If you want to play warbands on a tank, you don't play as a loldps spec, you play as snb or select 2h utility specs.

If you want to play in a warband on choppa/slayer, you don't play 2h spec, you play dual wield with the appropriate spec.

If you want to play as an engi/magus, you don't play as a single target/toughness roam spec. You spec appropiately.

WL you don't play with pet spec. You play loner.

Mara, you don't play a savagery/brutality build. You spec Monstro.

etc etc


All classes have specs that are not viable for warbands, if you want to play in proper warbands on these classes, maybe you don't get to play your preferred spec. For SH, this means you play mSH, rather than range.
I find it interesting how you compare a TANK Dps to a Squig herder, a RANGED DPS CLASS , telling them ''don't play the lolspec'' go melee...
You have totally understood the point of this entire post.
Because rSH isn't meant to be an aoe class, their range spec excels in other formats of the game. As shocking as this might be for some people to learn, there are in fact other facets to the game than mindless zerging,
aoe spamming and funnels. If you want to do those, Sh already has a spec that is suited to it.

The point clearly being that you should play the appropriate spec for whatever content you're doing if you want to do well in that content. You're all talking as though SH doesn't have an appropriate spec for aoe already, when it does. It's as simple as that. SW had no viable aoe build in any of spec. They were given one.
SW always had viable aoe from skirmish. We just received even better viability with the last major SW patch, at the cost of....quite a bit from Scout.

Re: RSH Underperforming

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2020 7:59 am
by Sundowner
ceramicartist wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:54 am
Jabba wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2020 3:38 am
Hardkoar wrote: Wed Oct 28, 2020 10:31 pm

I find it interesting how you compare a TANK Dps to a Squig herder, a RANGED DPS CLASS , telling them ''don't play the lolspec'' go melee...
You have totally understood the point of this entire post.
Because rSH isn't meant to be an aoe class, their range spec excels in other formats of the game. As shocking as this might be for some people to learn, there are in fact other facets to the game than mindless zerging,
aoe spamming and funnels. If you want to do those, Sh already has a spec that is suited to it.

The point clearly being that you should play the appropriate spec for whatever content you're doing if you want to do well in that content. You're all talking as though SH doesn't have an appropriate spec for aoe already, when it does. It's as simple as that. SW had no viable aoe build in any of spec. They were given one.
SW always had viable aoe from skirmish. We just received even better viability with the last major SW patch, at the cost of....quite a bit from Scout.
SW was buffed to be a bit more viable for wb and city playstyle. sh already has build that excels in these regards, only the fact that it doesn't have ranged aoe, doesn't mean that it should have one. sw and sh are not exact mirrors, sw's melee spec is viable only for solo target, not aoe, while sh melee spec is aoe.

Re: RSH Underperforming

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2020 8:08 am
by Sulorie
Jabba wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2020 3:38 am
Hardkoar wrote: Wed Oct 28, 2020 10:31 pm
Jabba wrote: Wed Oct 28, 2020 10:34 am Still don't understand why people are talking about rSH not being wanted in warbands as a reason for changing them. If you want to play in warbands on a sh, you don't play rSH.

If you want to play in warbands on zeal/shaman/dok/rp/wp/am....you don't play dps, you play heal.

If you want to play warbands on a tank, you don't play as a loldps spec, you play as snb or select 2h utility specs.

If you want to play in a warband on choppa/slayer, you don't play 2h spec, you play dual wield with the appropriate spec.

If you want to play as an engi/magus, you don't play as a single target/toughness roam spec. You spec appropiately.

WL you don't play with pet spec. You play loner.

Mara, you don't play a savagery/brutality build. You spec Monstro.

etc etc


All classes have specs that are not viable for warbands, if you want to play in proper warbands on these classes, maybe you don't get to play your preferred spec. For SH, this means you play mSH, rather than range.
I find it interesting how you compare a TANK Dps to a Squig herder, a RANGED DPS CLASS , telling them ''don't play the lolspec'' go melee...
You have totally understood the point of this entire post.
Because rSH isn't meant to be an aoe class, their range spec excels in other formats of the game. As shocking as this might be for some people to learn, there are in fact other facets to the game than mindless zerging,
aoe spamming and funnels. If you want to do those, Sh already has a spec that is suited to it.

The point clearly being that you should play the appropriate spec for whatever content you're doing if you want to do well in that content. You're all talking as though SH doesn't have an appropriate spec for aoe already, when it does. It's as simple as that. SW had no viable aoe build in any of spec. They were given one.
Don't waste your time arguing with them. Your first post to this topic was already spot on and anyone with at least some kind of common sense should have understood it long ago.

Re: RSH Underperforming

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2020 11:28 am
by Hardkoar
Sundowner wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2020 7:59 am
ceramicartist wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:54 am
Jabba wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2020 3:38 am

Because rSH isn't meant to be an aoe class, their range spec excels in other formats of the game. As shocking as this might be for some people to learn, there are in fact other facets to the game than mindless zerging,
aoe spamming and funnels. If you want to do those, Sh already has a spec that is suited to it.

The point clearly being that you should play the appropriate spec for whatever content you're doing if you want to do well in that content. You're all talking as though SH doesn't have an appropriate spec for aoe already, when it does. It's as simple as that. SW had no viable aoe build in any of spec. They were given one.
SW always had viable aoe from skirmish. We just received even better viability with the last major SW patch, at the cost of....quite a bit from Scout.
SW was buffed to be a bit more viable for wb and city playstyle. sh already has build that excels in these regards, only the fact that it doesn't have ranged aoe, doesn't mean that it should have one. sw and sh are not exact mirrors, sw's melee spec is viable only for solo target, not aoe, while sh melee spec is aoe.
Destro melee was tuned down to be more balanced with Order melee, ranged was untouched, SHR is part of it. Mirrors but not equals =/= Unbalanced. The fact that people are ok with one side being blatantly stronger pretty much sums up why the balance is tipped to Easy mode Vs Masochists.

Re: RSH Underperforming

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2020 11:30 am
by Hardkoar
Hardkoar wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2020 11:28 am
Sundowner wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2020 7:59 am
ceramicartist wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:54 am

SW always had viable aoe from skirmish. We just received even better viability with the last major SW patch, at the cost of....quite a bit from Scout.
SW was buffed to be a bit more viable for wb and city playstyle. sh already has build that excels in these regards, only the fact that it doesn't have ranged aoe, doesn't mean that it should have one. sw and sh are not exact mirrors, sw's melee spec is viable only for solo target, not aoe, while sh melee spec is aoe.
Destro melee was tuned down to be more balanced with Order melee, ranged was untouched, SHR is part of it. Mirrors but not equals =/= Unbalanced. The fact that people are ok with one side being blatantly stronger pretty much sums up why the balance is tipped to Easy mode Vs Masochists.



Re: RSH Underperforming

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2020 11:33 am
by Ugle
Repeating yourself won't change the veracity of the statment, which is, to put it politely, lacking..

Re: RSH Underperforming

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2020 11:40 am
by Xergon
If u want to play rSH in WB atm only viable spec is ShotTruYa spam, with ExpertSkirmisher tactic, u need a bit brain and awarness to make use of that spec and ofc proper Guard n Heal to keep u alive while being close to enemy, but if u really want to be AoE usefull as rSH thats the only proper way atm. Other than that u need to wait for rSH rework which happen to SW.

Re: RSH Underperforming

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:21 pm
by Neverever
People speak as if RSW got buffed only in terms of AOE and for WB build but that is not true.
RSW got buffed even more in 1vs1 and single target damage.
SO yes RSH needs at least a slight dmg increase on its abilities to catch up with what you see in the video.


Click here to watch on YouTube

Re: RSH Underperforming

Posted: Thu Oct 29, 2020 2:05 pm
by NSKaneda
Xergon wrote: Thu Oct 29, 2020 11:40 am If u want to play rSH in WB atm only viable spec is ShotTruYa spam, with ExpertSkirmisher tactic, u need a bit brain and awarness to make use of that spec and ofc proper Guard n Heal to keep u alive while being close to enemy, but if u really want to be AoE usefull as rSH thats the only proper way atm.

Expert skirmisher tactic has been reworked a while back and now it only triggers when you are within 20ft from your target. That range bugs out a lot due to latency issues and on point blank range lag makes it work 2 times out of 10 (not only on rSH but any class with ES), often elongating cast times instead of reducing them. I've bug reported it and guess what, working as intended according to devs.

So yeah, shoot thru ya spam still works but ES+spam is unreliable to say the least.