Re: [RoR] Behind the scene, incoming content.
Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2020 5:15 pm
From last nights IC fight, Leave It To Cleaver:


Warhammer Online
https://returnofreckoning.com/forum/
This will be hotfixed. Definitely had the wrong model assigned.Martok wrote: Thu Jun 11, 2020 4:49 pm I appreciate the new weapon content, truly.
But...
Yesterday I picked up the new Fortress Great Sword for my SM and it looks like a meat-cleaver. Seriously, it is a one hand weapon and all the animations associated with using it are one hand driven and the Great-Sword looks like a cheap Master-Chef tool found second hand at Walmart.
Please advise if this was by intent, or somehow I picked-up a Choppa skin.
Thank you.
EDIT: I can post an image if you desire.
wargrimnir wrote: Thu Jun 11, 2020 5:27 pmThis will be hotfixed. Definitely had the wrong model assigned.
We're looking at removing procs from weapons directly and adding them to new talismans. That's why you're seeing them repeated on new items.Sinisterror wrote: Fri Jun 12, 2020 1:20 pm Amazing work! Looks great but im a little disappointed in the procs, because it is basically same one's that you can get from T4 epic quest wpns and subjugator and now these. 3 ways to get wpns with same procs. City weapons have some new ones and some very good ones. And a bit same with triumphant/victorious gear because same set bonuses than in oppressor/vanguisher and it makes it feels like there is not a lot of choices. New procs/set bonuses would add more diversity in gameplay if done right and thinking outside the box and get creative with them bonuses and procs,probably not hard to test ?
Also Pls make one place always open in T2 or T3 for rvr that isnt in campaign, and no lvl 40 allowed and T2-T3 would be back to 3 tactics only. If there is no lvl 40's and 4th tactic slot is not usable it simplifies and is close to fair fights. Bring back debolster and if you are debolstered you can que scs in that lower tier, would love this on many of my lvl40 rr20 chars and posssibilty of new overlord/imperator quest kind of thing. This would make everyone enjoy RvR more because, well the obviuous reasons. Respect the work you do, eternal hails <3
wargrimnir wrote: Fri Jun 12, 2020 1:37 pmWe're looking at removing procs from weapons directly and adding them to new talismans. That's why you're seeing them repeated on new items.Sinisterror wrote: Fri Jun 12, 2020 1:20 pm Amazing work! Looks great but im a little disappointed in the procs, because it is basically same one's that you can get from T4 epic quest wpns and subjugator and now these. 3 ways to get wpns with same procs. City weapons have some new ones and some very good ones. And a bit same with triumphant/victorious gear because same set bonuses than in oppressor/vanguisher and it makes it feels like there is not a lot of choices. New procs/set bonuses would add more diversity in gameplay if done right and thinking outside the box and get creative with them bonuses and procs,probably not hard to test ?
Also Pls make one place always open in T2 or T3 for rvr that isnt in campaign, and no lvl 40 allowed and T2-T3 would be back to 3 tactics only. If there is no lvl 40's and 4th tactic slot is not usable it simplifies and is close to fair fights. Bring back debolster and if you are debolstered you can que scs in that lower tier, would love this on many of my lvl40 rr20 chars and posssibilty of new overlord/imperator quest kind of thing. This would make everyone enjoy RvR more because, well the obviuous reasons. Respect the work you do, eternal hails <3
Your issue with T2+ is that you're not using Bolster efficiently. We have no plans to rework RvR, and it's not the first time someone has asked us to revert back to a system that simply did not work the way you imagine. We gave already lived through that experience both on Live and in RoR. T2+ works significantly better.
ekalime wrote: Fri Jun 12, 2020 2:18 pmThat cracked me up, I don't know why you're complaining about that weapon. Do you not appreciate the dozens of hours some one spent making that cleaver?![]()