Page 6 of 7

Re: Uthgard 2.0

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 11:37 pm
by mayh
noisestorm wrote:
footpatrol2 wrote:If anything this is kinda gettin me excited for camelot unchained.
I believe it will heavily flop to say the least, but i'd be glad to be mistaken

I'm also extremely optimistic but I have the same feeling, please let us both be wrong =(

Re: Uthgard 2.0

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:00 pm
by footpatrol2
So I R curious...

Why do you think unchained won't be good? Too dreamy? Shooting too high?

So far I have really enjoyed mark jacob games.

Re: Uthgard 2.0

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 8:04 pm
by bloodi
Ultimately, they are the ones who created Daoc and War, with all the good and bad that comes with it.

And seeing their proposed abilities, class archetypes and overall system, is not like they learned much. They are again selling outrageous things that probably will never work ingame or will be heavily neutered in the live version.

I mean, WP/DOK were going to be melee healers remember?

Re: Uthgard 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 1:24 am
by Vigfuss
bloodi wrote:Ultimately, they are the ones who created Daoc and War, with all the good and bad that comes with it.
Sheesh it's as if you might never actually play one of these games. CU is far from launch that's all anyone can say at this point.

Re: Uthgard 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 2:00 am
by Dabbart
Vigfuss wrote: Sheesh it's as if you might never actually play one of these games. CU is far from launch that's all anyone can say at this point.
Truth that is. I've been on beta or EA of some form on a bunch of games. This far out, it could still take a wild left turn at any point. But they do have the advantage of a pile of cash...

I'll keep checking in on both CU and Uthgard. They both have promise. But then again, that's true for about a dozen games in development atm...

Re: Uthgard 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 4:38 am
by Vigfuss
Dabbart wrote:
Vigfuss wrote: Sheesh it's as if you might never actually play one of these games. CU is far from launch that's all anyone can say at this point.
Truth that is. I've been on beta or EA of some form on a bunch of games. This far out, it could still take a wild left turn at any point. But they do have the advantage of a pile of cash...

I'll keep checking in on both CU and Uthgard. They both have promise. But then again, that's true for about a dozen games in development atm...
I highly doubt a wild left from CU, because they were pretty clear from the start what kind of game it would be. They'll do what they said they would, but it will take time.

Re: Uthgard 2.0

Posted: Fri Jul 29, 2016 8:14 am
by vyperanet
playing

Re: Uthgard 2.0

Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 1:12 am
by footpatrol2
So uthgard is down... /sigh wtf. Am I expected to actually go outside and be social? gah.

Re: Uthgard 2.0

Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 8:41 am
by Skiantos
footpatrol2 wrote:So uthgard is down... /sigh wtf. Am I expected to actually go outside and be social? gah.
:mrgreen:

Image

Re: Uthgard 2.0

Posted: Sat Jul 30, 2016 3:21 pm
by StormX2
i played a cleric up to 15 when 2.0 came online finally. but ror was kickin so i stopped playin.

anyone here from the original DAOC CLassic CLuster?
I played Albion on Gareth i think it was called?

Played with the Knights of Nee for about 6 years lol