[PVP]Scenario balance suggestion
Forum rules
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Before posting in this forum, please read the Terms of Use.
This section is for providing feedback and sharing your opinions on what could be improved or changed for the Return of Reckoning project.
To ensure your feedback is as helpful as possible, please review the Rules and Posting Guidelines before posting.
Re: [PVP]Scenario balance suggestion
The manager will not (and should not) attempt to form optimal groups. It should limit itself to ensuring a reasonable prevalence of required archetypes. Anything beyond that is up to the players to solve by forming groups.
Ads
Re: [PVP]Scenario balance suggestion
I like this, it is the direction dota took with its MM compared to LoL. I know many people here hate MOBAS but I think at the core this issue is similar enough to compare them?Azarael wrote:The manager will not (and should not) attempt to form optimal groups. It should limit itself to ensuring a reasonable prevalence of required archetypes. Anything beyond that is up to the players to solve by forming groups.
This combined with group only 6v6 ques, if those are still planned for EC and hopefully other scenarios in the future would be a huge step up from what we had on live.
People should be able to expect a casual/fun atmosphere in 12v12/18v18 scenarios, and if they want to get serious and have challenge they can form a 6 man and que up for group only scenarios. And players who want to play with friends in a casual environment can still que for 12v12/18v18. Though it would be nice to have a PUG only SC, and maybe a 12v12 group only SC as well (4 groups). Disclaimer: this is just my opinion mannnn
♂ ♂ ♂ <Lords of the Locker Room> ♂ ♂ ♂ <Old School> ♂ ♂ ♂
Re: [PVP]Scenario balance suggestion
if you run out of 2-2-2 toward 1-3-2, think how looong and unfair will be for tanks to get sc pop. Anyhting exept 2-2-2 will hurt one archetype and favoiriting other and that is not pug friendly, where this change is aimed to help...
Mostly harmless
K8P & Norn - guild Orz
K8P & Norn - guild Orz
- DefinitelyNotWingz
- Posts: 286
Re: [PVP]Scenario balance suggestion
I explained earlier why 2-2-2 favors mdps, but in general an equal number of archetypes hurts the most popular archetypes queue- time. I think it can be said with absolute certainty that the DPS archetypes are far more popular than healers or tanks. Soooo -> not pug friendly at all.Nameless wrote:if you run out of 2-2-2 toward 1-3-2, think how looong and unfair will be for tanks to get sc pop. Anyhting exept 2-2-2 will hurt one archetype and favoiriting other and that is not pug friendly, where this change is aimed to help...
You know who I am.
Re: [PVP]Scenario balance suggestion
and just like in WoW tanks and healers will have shorter ques while dps will have longer ones. People who play the under utilized archetypes get rewarded. Its simple and proven to work.DefinitelyNotWingz wrote:I explained earlier why 2-2-2 favors mdps, but in general an equal number of archetypes hurts the most popular archetypes queue- time. I think it can be said with absolute certainty that the DPS archetypes are far more popular than healers or tanks. Soooo -> not pug friendly at all.Nameless wrote:if you run out of 2-2-2 toward 1-3-2, think how looong and unfair will be for tanks to get sc pop. Anyhting exept 2-2-2 will hurt one archetype and favoiriting other and that is not pug friendly, where this change is aimed to help...
Tklees Chatoullier
Gagirbinn
Gagirbinn
- DefinitelyNotWingz
- Posts: 286
Re: [PVP]Scenario balance suggestion
Or we will have overall increased queue times when not enough tanks healers are queueing on one side.Tklees wrote:and just like in WoW tanks and healers will have shorter ques while dps will have longer ones. People who play the under utilized archetypes get rewarded. Its simple and proven to work.DefinitelyNotWingz wrote:I explained earlier why 2-2-2 favors mdps, but in general an equal number of archetypes hurts the most popular archetypes queue- time. I think it can be said with absolute certainty that the DPS archetypes are far more popular than healers or tanks. Soooo -> not pug friendly at all.Nameless wrote:if you run out of 2-2-2 toward 1-3-2, think how looong and unfair will be for tanks to get sc pop. Anyhting exept 2-2-2 will hurt one archetype and favoiriting other and that is not pug friendly, where this change is aimed to help...
WoW works with a larger population I suppose.
You know who I am.
Re: [PVP]Scenario balance suggestion
obviously they do. I think there are enough of each arch quing its just that they arent getting in the right balance in each SC. I rarely solo que admittedly, but sometimes there are tons of healers and next sc there are only 2 and there are a bunch of tanks. Im not saying I know all of this for sure but if we give it a try and see its increased que times it can be reverted im sure.DefinitelyNotWingz wrote:Or we will have overall increased queue times when not enough tanks healers are queueing on one side.Tklees wrote:and just like in WoW tanks and healers will have shorter ques while dps will have longer ones. People who play the under utilized archetypes get rewarded. Its simple and proven to work.DefinitelyNotWingz wrote:
I explained earlier why 2-2-2 favors mdps, but in general an equal number of archetypes hurts the most popular archetypes queue- time. I think it can be said with absolute certainty that the DPS archetypes are far more popular than healers or tanks. Soooo -> not pug friendly at all.
WoW works with a larger population I suppose.
Tklees Chatoullier
Gagirbinn
Gagirbinn
Re: [PVP]Scenario balance suggestion
I think Az said something along the lines of the SC manager slowly putting less priority on group comp if the que lasts too long?
like if things are slow like NA late night it will trade off proper groups for more reasonable pop times?
like if things are slow like NA late night it will trade off proper groups for more reasonable pop times?
♂ ♂ ♂ <Lords of the Locker Room> ♂ ♂ ♂ <Old School> ♂ ♂ ♂
Ads
Re: [PVP]Scenario balance suggestion
The game's metrics from realm war and surveys I ran after we lost access to realm war consistently had populations of just under 30% heal archetype, with the mdps, rdps and tank archetypes each having just under 25% of the population. Some of those heal archetype toons were dps, so about 50% of the pop were dps. How is 2-2-2 an equal representation of the pop as claimed when dps make up 50% of the population? TK, you seem to be suggesting that a lot of people who are currently playing dps should reroll as healers and tanks just so we can get scen pops. I don't see that working.
Last edited by Annaise16 on Sun Feb 07, 2016 9:17 pm, edited 4 times in total.
- DefinitelyNotWingz
- Posts: 286
Re: [PVP]Scenario balance suggestion
I am rather with Aza. Giving pugs 2-2-2 makes them less able to compete with a premade. Having the same setup but worse comunication, gear, skill will not result in a win. Pugs would profit from more dmg to get through guard or from more heal to outlast premades. With the current quality of pug dps (combined with the missing voicecom for better assist) you cant really get through guard with equal numbers.Azarael wrote:The manager will not (and should not) attempt to form optimal groups. It should limit itself to ensuring a reasonable prevalence of required archetypes. Anything beyond that is up to the players to solve by forming groups.
You know who I am.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Twyxx and 1 guest